“we need to remove legacy policing from contemporary policing…”

A timely reminder, should one be needed, from Newton Emerson in the Irish Times this week, that when Sinn Féin talk about ‘agreement’ on the “need to remove legacy policing from contemporary policing” what they mean is “No prosecutions, please.”  From Newton Emerson in the Irish Times

It is all or nothing on dealing with the legacy of the Troubles. Either all sides must face the same prospect of prosecutions and convictions, or all sides must be given an amnesty or the closest thing legally possible to an amnesty – a statute of limitations is most often mentioned.

This the real divide on the subject and it cuts across traditional lines. The British government and Sinn Féin want an amnesty; other nationalists, unionists and the Irish Government do not.

Even in Northern Ireland this is poorly understood, as it suits various interests to confuse the issue. The British government wants an amnesty for its former soldiers because pursuing them for Troubles-era crimes is politically unacceptable in Britain. The blanket amnesty this would require would mean no justice for victims of terrorism. This is considered a price worth paying in Westminster and MPs across the political spectrum have little compunction in saying so.

Sinn Féin takes the same position on its former “soldiers”, although it is far more squeamish in admitting it, given the prominence of victims issues within nationalist communities. This is what sank the first attempt at an amnesty.

In 2001, the British government and Sinn Féin agreed a de facto amnesty at the Weston Park talks – the first major negotiation after the Belfast Agreement.

This progressed as far as a 2005 Westminster Bill, until the SDLP embarrassed Sinn Féin into withdrawing support for it, by pointing out it included security force personnel.

And, as Newton goes on to note

On legacy, fears of a British-unionist plot are precisely wrong. The truth is that unionists fear a British-republican plot, and with good reason. Not only have London and Sinn Féin sought an amnesty before – the last time under a Labour government – but all their priorities still point in that direction.

Northern Ireland now has a set of legacy mechanisms awaiting operation.

The DUP, Sinn Féin and the British government agreed them in 2014 and re-agreed to implement them before Stormont collapsed. They are currently out for consultation.

One of these mechanisms already contains a form of amnesty in return for confession. A fuller amnesty could be bolted on elsewhere before or during the system’s scheduled five-year operation, while an end to Troubles prosecutions is the presumed end-point of the exercise. But this remains too contentious to state explicitly.

Legacy has a parallel with Brexit in that neither are mentioned in the Belfast Agreement, yet views on how they interact with its “spirit” have created their own reality.

From the agreement’s prisoner release programme, through Weston Park and other side deals, it has always been clear that Sinn Féin and the British government interpret the peace process as implying an amnesty, even if that remains unfinished business.

As holders of all the cards, it must be presumed they will get there in the end. The ultimate legacy question is how much everyone else will be fooled and divided along the way. [added emphasis]


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.