Manifestos and how to avoid dealing in meaningless small minded political tropes?

Ah I think I have finally got my workflow right. So here’s an audio copy of this morning’s #SluggerReport Daily (213 LIVE viewers). You can pick up most of them on Audioboom here.

The local anchor for today’s report is the apparently bonkers proposal from the DUP manifesto to build a tunnel from Northern Ireland to Scotland, more broadly though it is this excellent piece from academic, former Labour spad and Southwark councillor, Patrick Diamond:

…it’s also important to ensure that policies can be delivered in the real world. Too many fiascos have originated from parties failing to adequately stress-test new policy ideas. Take, for example, the Conservatives’ “community charge” (otherwise known as the poll tax) from the 1987 election manifesto.

That later became unworkable due to its unfairness. Then there were Labour’s individual learning accounts, which had to be abandoned in 2001 following widespread financial fraud.

The problem is that once commitments are enshrined in party manifestos they are then difficult to break, even if they look increasingly unworkable, or do not provide value for money.

It’s a strong point which goes to the heart of cynicism not least amongst younger people that politicians are capable to doing anything to re-shape the environment around them.

Fianna Fail’s latest health policy gets mention, not least for the value of resisting pressure to report too early on a policy before it has been stressed and tested.

Diamond’s proposal is to open up the Civil Service to political policy makers before the election so that what goes into the manifesto is not simply costed but also realistic.

The civil service should have a formal role in working with politicians and advisers to scrutinise policy ideas prior to their inclusion in manifestos. At present, there are rules governing the process by which the major opposition party consults Whitehall officials, but in practice these amount to cursory discussions between shadow cabinet ministers and permanent secretaries. The terms of engagement remain too limited.

This fits neatly into the #OpenGovernment agenda which we’ve been working with the Building Change Trust to develop in Northern Ireland (see our ever popular Six Memos on OGP for NI).

Bonkers it may be. 21 miles is a very long way even by international standards. There’s the depth of Beaufort Dyke and buried munitions. There’s the complication of geology and drilling. There’s the poor transport infrastructure in Dumfries and Galloway.

But it’s notable for its focus on Northern Ireland’s future relative to the rest of the UK. Both big parties appear to be waking up to how development of London has come at the expense of the rest of the UK.

If the ‘northern powerhouse’ ever comes about, ease of travel between Belfast, Manchester, Glasgow and Edinburgh may become critical, not simply for Northern Ireland, but the rest of the island. Without an adequately thorough and technical description of the problem what looks impossible now will still look impossible if and when that renewal is successful.

What distinguishes this from the six impossible things before breakfast is that the DUP aren’t selling it as a fait accompli, but as part of a feasibility study they have already bid for under the new European Fund for Strategic Investments scheme launched by Claude Van Juncker last November.

Bonkers yes. But hey, it is one, better than re-treading the past because we don’t have the imagination to embrace a different future, and two, you know what, we might not have the capacity to build it now, but the investment in testing its feasibility might allow a future generation to know that when and if it can.

Personally I’m a big fan of bridging projects, regardless of how modest or ambitious they are. They all contain a promise of transformation, whether successful like the Harry Blaney bridge in Donegal or the unsuccessful bridge over Narrow Water.

Transformation requires a whole series of smaller actions taken together but in a longer time frame. Just the kind of thing politics has been migrating away from since the 1960s.

Note: iPhone users can hear the ‪#‎SluggerReport‬ LIVE every weekday at 10am only on the Periscope app. This is a ‘redux’ version which you can also find on Slugger’s Audioboom channel:

Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.