“The fact is it’s recorded in smoke..”

PhonautographA fascinating, if slightly eerie, sound has surfaced 148 years after it was recorded – That’s 17 years before Edison spoke “Mary had a little lamb” onto his phonograph. The Professor pointed to this New York Times article about the recording yesterday and the BBC have followed up today with this online report and they also have an audio report [RealPlayer file] which includes a recording of Thomas Edison and an interview with the great-grandson of the inventor responsible, Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville. First Sounds uncovered the 1860 recording, and they have others – “Scott recorded someone singing an excerpt from the French folksong “Au Clair de la Lune” on April 9, 1860″ [mp3 file]. From the First Sounds press release [pdf file]

Roughly ten seconds in length, the recording is of a person singing “Au clair de la lune, Pierrot répondit” – a snippet from a French folksong. It was made on April 9, 1860 by Parisian inventor Édouard-Léon Scott de Martinville on his “phonautograph” – a device that scratched sound waves onto a sheet of paper blackened by the smoke of an oil lamp.

And from the BBC report

“When I first heard the recording as you hear it … it was magical, so ethereal,” audio historian David Giovannoni, who found the recording, told AP.

“The fact is it’s recorded in smoke. The voice is coming out from behind this screen of aural smoke.”
….

Previously, the oldest known recorded voice was thought to be Thomas Edison’s recording of Mary had a little lamb. The inventor of the light bulb recorded the stanza to test another of his inventions – the phonograph – in 1877.

“It doesn’t take anything away from Thomas Edison, in my opinion,” Mr Giovannoni told Reuters.

“But actually, the truth is he was the first person to have recorded [sound] and played it back.”

The recording had some unfortunate consequences for a Radio 4 newsreader this morning.


Discover more from Slugger O'Toole

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

We are reader supported. Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger. While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.