Robinson's plan: fundamental flaws

I have been on the search for Frank Millar’s interview (subscription only) with Peter Robinson in last Wednesday’s Irish Times. Finally my paper copy arrived on Saturday morning, so that I have now managed to track it down on the web.

Although Millar is the London Editor of the Irish Times, he was also for many years a leading member of the UUP. It’s clear that, at times, Robinson treats this as a conversation between two political rivals, rather than between an ‘impartial’ journalist and a politician. This important piece is the first hint of a ‘plan B’. It may also presage the final leg of the DUP’s assent from fringe loyalist protest party to key a leadership role in mainstream politics.

Robinson starts with his objection to the current form of agreement:

“The Belfast Agreement was fundamentally flawed. The core principle was that instead of confronting terrorism you actually elevated terrorists, gentrified their leaders, accommodated their wrongdoing and rewarded their evil. That’s the antithesis of the policy that I pursue.”

“And having been an opponent of David Trimble on the Belfast Agreement, it would only be my enemies who would attempt to associate me with it.”

Donate to keep Slugger lit!

For over 20 years, Slugger has been an independent place for debate and new ideas. We have published over 40,000 posts and over one and a half million comments on the site. Each month we have over 70,000 readers. All this we have accomplished with only volunteers we have never had any paid staff.

Slugger does not receive any funding, and we respect our readers, so we will never run intrusive ads or sponsored posts. Instead, we are reader-supported. Help us keep Slugger independent by becoming a friend of Slugger.

While we run a tight ship and no one gets paid to write, we need money to help us cover our costs.

If you like what we do, we are asking you to consider giving a monthly donation of any amount, or you can give a one-off donation. Any amount is appreciated.