![]() |
|
You are here Home | Sport | Wilson tackles anthem, Queen leaving Windsor ... Next or Previous « Today in the Dail... | Main | Far right 'imagination'... »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
October 05, 2005 Wilson tackles anthem, Queen leaving Windsor ... COULD the Queen get the boot from Windsor, worries the News Letter. Robin Wilson of Democratic Dialogue thinks the building of the new Maze stadium could be the "right time for a new song", in the same way that the other regions of the UK have their own distinctive pre-game 'anthems'. Why not get rid of it? It's tediously slow and capable of rousing neither players or fans - apart from those who insist on getting in their obligatory 'No Surrender' just before they 'send her victorious'! Why is this such a big deal. I imagine everybody who attends NI games is quite happy with the English/UK National Anthem being played. Changing it will hardly attract new fans. The only people complaining are people who would never attend anyway. Posted by: Cahal at October 5, 2005 04:29 AM New song needed. Why should regional soccer be reserved for the prods? Fans of cultural aparteid cannot expect state funding for their big stadiums and corporate boxes. Posted by: aquifer at October 5, 2005 07:52 AM cahal, there is a pretty healthy debate on the matter within NI fan circles so good to see it being raised elsewhere. Posted by: TOT at October 5, 2005 08:23 AM cahal, there is a pretty healthy debate on the matter within NI fan circles so good to see it being raised elsewhere. Posted by: TOT at October 5, 2005 08:24 AM So if NI football fans must sacrifice the playing of God Save the Queen in this 'new stadium for all' what ideas have the GAA got to replace any 'national' anthem that they will play before matches at the new venue? Posted by: IanK at October 5, 2005 08:39 AM IanK The GAA won't be using the venue. Posted by: Henry94 at October 5, 2005 08:52 AM Henry94 I thought the GAA had agreed to use the proposed new venue for several fixtures a year ? Posted by: DN at October 5, 2005 09:16 AM Sorry Ian K, that well worn line doesn't wash - at GAA games, none of the teams claim to represent the nation. They are instead part of a national sporting movement and as such the playing of the national anthem is entirely understandable and welcome. When Northern Ireland plays, it is claiming (presumably) to represent the aspirations of everyone in Northern Ireland and the reality is that almost half of the people here will never be moved by the British national anthem. Any counter argument about NI being part of the UK is nonsense - of course it is for now, but so are Wales and Scotland and they manage to stand at the start of games listening to the strains of anthems that mean something to all their people. There are no coherent arguments for keeping GSTQ at Northern Ireland games, but the unfortunate reality is that it will stay because of the ugly underbelly of NI soccer support (minority) who simply won't allow it. Henry 94 - you say that the GAA won't use any stadium - are you sure about that? Did Danny Murphy not already confirm Ulster Council interest in the project? Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 09:22 AM DN They had to say that or the stadium wouldn't be built but they have no need of it. If a game is big enough it will go to Croke Park. Otherwise the gAA has enough facilities of its own. Soccer and Rugby need it but the GAA was put in a position where they would have been responsible for it not bing built if they were honest about their intentions. Posted by: Henry94 at October 5, 2005 09:23 AM I really don't care for the Queen - what about God Save The Republic? Anyhow, what's really amusing about this Newsletter story is that it's the second 'lift' of a story from the Sunday World by the NL that's been blogged by Slugger, the previous one being the PSNI warning to a SW journalist that he's targeted by Provos - as if the super slick republican media machine would get their hands dirty in such a way. (It seems to me that it was a handy way for the PSNI to deflect criticism for their lack of action in the investigation into an actual murder of a SW journalist by unionist paramilitaries/drug dealers (delete as applicable). Posted by: Oilbhéar Chromaill at October 5, 2005 09:29 AM Northern FF Posted by: IanK at October 5, 2005 09:31 AM As a NI supporter and regular attender at matches for 16 years I've long held the view that we should have a NI-specific anthem. Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 09:35 AM Although I am fond of GSTQ, and it does it for me, I have no problem with a change. As the person above says, we can have something more discintively Northern Irish. If that makes some people more enthusiastic about supporting NI then all the better. We always want to maximize support for NI. Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 09:45 AM Henry I think the idea was that the new stadium would be there for GAA as well as other sports, so as to create more shared spaces. However if the GAA actually don't want to use it, they should be clear about this, and say that they don't mind it going ahead without their participation, because the different pitch sizes mean that it would be better for rugby and association football to build a slightly smaller pitch. Posted by: Slug at October 5, 2005 09:51 AM How about Slugger fielding suggestions for a new anthem for the N.I. team? Posted by: foreign correspondent at October 5, 2005 10:05 AM Slug The government said that if the GAA weren't going to use it then it wouldn't be built at all. Posted by: Henry94 at October 5, 2005 10:13 AM Henry I believe the govt want GAA on board for 'parity of esteem' reasons. But if the GAA were to say its not a 'parity of esteem' issue for them then the government would be able to go ahead without them. I believe that this outcome would be better than building a large stadium and then the GAA not using it. I don't think the GAA are really doing any favours to other sports if they are being dishonest. Although you are claiming they are being dishonest, I can only assume that they would not behave in that manner, which is quite reprehensible for such a major investment of public money. Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 10:24 AM The GAA will use the stadium, that's why the size was increased from 30k to 42k. Now back on topic. Many fans will resist a move to change the anthem but many support it. I think many more would support it if someone came up with a credible alternative. I personally don't have a problem with GSTQ, but I also don't have a problem with changing it to something else, if that something else is a) distinctly Northern Irish and b) a decent song. Unfortunately I don't know any song that meets both those requirements. Posted by: beano at October 5, 2005 10:30 AM beano Sis you see Sunday Life's story that the stadium is to be ajustable so that it can go from 30k to 42k depending on the game? What do the NI fans think of this idea - surely it is good? Do you know if the issue of pitch size has been addressed? e.g. is there there a plan for adjustability on that as well? Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 10:33 AM "The GAA will use the stadium, that's why the size was increased from 30k to 42k" Indeed, which unfortunately has meant the IRFU Ulster Branch are hardly going to use it and its in all likelihood going to be very unsuitable for the football as well. Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 10:34 AM Very true Mike. Although it might give the IRFU a little more incentive to play the odd Ireland match there. So that's 1 game every year if we're lucky! One thing that's been mentioned the odd time - what if the Northern Ireland team was to introduce a second anthem like the Ireland rugby team have, to run alongside GSTQ? Posted by: beano at October 5, 2005 10:42 AM Ian K, I recommend you look again at my earlier post, where your questions are answered. If your aim is to raise a new suggestion - that all IFA games should be preceded by GSTQ, go for it. I'm sure there are plenty who'd have a view on it. I don't have a view on that because I have absolutely no interest in Irish league soccer. My point, which I've already explained above, realtes to International games, where the stated aim of the IFA is to get everyone who lives here involved. One more thing - I've often heard Jim Boyce et al publicly wondering why some people in NI are offended by the playing of GSTQ. The truth is that I, and I expect many like me, aren't offended at all by it. But if they want me to spend my cash and actively support the team, they need to raise the bar a little higher than not offending me. Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 10:44 AM Northern FF - Would you go and support NI if GSTQ was replaced with a NI anthem? Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 10:56 AM Wasn't the Derry Air, oops, Londonderry air, feck it, Danny Boy used for events and gatherings as representing 'Northern Ireland' in a non-partisan way? It's a well worn tune but familiar and comforting and surely preferable to the comically absurd and dirgey GSTQ. Posted by: P Ring at October 5, 2005 11:00 AM id like to see a new NI anthem too, something that both sides in NI can relate to.... possibley 'Firestarter' from The Prodigy would be suitable :) Posted by: eranu at October 5, 2005 11:06 AM Northern FF Posted by: IanK at October 5, 2005 11:07 AM In GAA circles especially in Ulster feelings are running high concerning any participation in this new stadium. Firstly theres the Clones issue and they for one don`t want to lose any major games and then theres Casement Park, a modern stadium which some say should now take over from Clones. Added to that, games being moved to Croke Park! And an issue that some seem not to mention theres a groundswell of Ulster GAA supporters in total oposition to this new Maze stadium. Posted by: Dick Doggins at October 5, 2005 11:11 AM Dick - you guys should get together with the football and rugby people. It seems stupid that the govt would impose something on the fans. Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 11:13 AM Ian K, to quote from my original post: "at GAA games, none of the teams claim to represent the nation. They are instead part of a national sporting movement and as such the playing of the national anthem is entirely understandable and welcome." I think that's pretty clear. And as I said in my second posting, you are entitled to compare like-with-like and ask whether there there should be a NI flag and anthem before Irish League games. I don't care. Once again, I'm talking about INTERNATIONAL soccer games where the IFA claims to want to attract everyone from NI to come along and actively support the Northern Ireland team. Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 11:19 AM Dick - arguments about Casement aside, do you think there would be more appetite for a 40k stadium if it was built in Belfast? Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 11:22 AM Mike - if the IFA made the move to drop GSTQ on the basis that they were trying to allow more people to feel a part of it, I'd have to say yes. I'd buy a ticket, go along, have a look and see what's going on. I can't say that I'd turn into any major fan - I have a dislike of any sports teams that encourge catholics and Prods to support "their own" teams when they should be on the same side (ROI included). But I'd have a look. Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 11:27 AM "do you think there would be more appetite for a 40k stadium if it was built in Belfast?" The main problem I see with any alternative venue is that the GAA are still a very insular and secretive organisation when its comes to Finances!!! Posted by: Dick Doggins at October 5, 2005 11:33 AM Slug The only games I foresee being played at the Maze site would be exhibitions. Posted by: Dick Doggins at October 5, 2005 11:37 AM Northern FF Posted by: IanK at October 5, 2005 11:59 AM The business case for a new multi purpose stadium at the Maze requires the long term and whole hearted participation of all the major sports and particularly Rugby, Association Football and the G.A.A.It would be necessary for each organisation to commit to a number of major events over a lengthy period of time to make the stadium viable in terms of its future maintenance once the money -mostly from government(British) sources-is raised for the project; money that can not be transferred to other projects and only available one time for the specific purpose. Posted by: T.Ruth at October 5, 2005 12:10 PM Question, If the Irish rugby team played in this new stadium would GSTQ be played ? How would the majority of supporters feel about that ? Posted by: Setanta at October 5, 2005 12:46 PM T.Ruth, Or is one only a Protestant in Ireland if one considers oneself British? That's a bit selective of you. Anyway, why should an organisation which is there to promote Irish culture become more British, surely it is for the British in Ireland to promote their own pastimes rather than whining that nobody is accommodating them? Unionists, for the most part, don't consider themselves part of the Irish nation and I've never heard one say the GAA represents them. I don't care what the Ulster Scots Agency does or sings when it meets up, for example. As for the Maze, it is not a national stadium to the best of my knowledge so why do you call it such? Posted by: George at October 5, 2005 12:53 PM Relax George! Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 01:08 PM "The only people complaining are people who would never attend anyway". You've hit the nail on the head Cahal. As the banner read in Windsor on that never to be forgotten Wednesday September evening, Northern Ireland fans are patriotic, not sectarian. We're proud, not prejudiced. That is more than I can say for a large section of nationalist politicians. The conversation with Gerry Kelly, who when asked if he would support Northern Ireland against England later that evening, went along these lines; Kelly: "Well as you know I always like to see the English get beat". Reporter: "So that means you're supporting Northern Ireland tonight?" Kelly: "I'm supporting the Republic". Just one example of the naked sectarian bigotry of some nationalist politicians, which should have no place in sport as far as I'm concerned. Our national side should unite, not divide us... Posted by: Concerned Loyalist at October 5, 2005 01:09 PM I like to counter foreign correspondent's suggestion of choosing something for Paul McCarney's drug hazed years, but instead of the nonsense of "Give Ireland Back To The Irish" why not use the follow-up single "Mary Had A Little Lamb" or perhaps something of a later vintage like "The Frog Chorus". Yes I can see them all now in Windsor Park going "bom bom bom...". Seriously Northern Ireland does need a new and agred anthem and flag. I think that "Danny Boy" might make a good anthem or failing that how's about using Ulsterman Phil Coulter's "Ireland's Call"? As for a flag, I have about ten designs in my head! I do think that the Republic could do with a new modern anthem as well, even going back to our orginal anthem would be an improvement (and I say that a a practising agnostic!). Posted by: Keith M at October 5, 2005 01:22 PM "Ireland's Call"? ‘One proud province of Northern Ireland’ doesn’t have the same ring to it. 'a practising agnostic' Does one have to practice at being an agnostic? Is there a fear of reverting to faith. ;-) Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 01:27 PM Smcgiff "One proud province of Northern Ireland" could be "One proud province of Ulster!". "Does one have to practice at being an agnostic?" Absolutely, I have to sacrifice a virgin at least once a month or I'll fall prey to the old ladies with the rosary beads!
Posted by: Keith M at October 5, 2005 01:32 PM That is more than I can say for a large section of nationalist politicians. The conversation with Gerry Kelly, who when asked if he would support Northern Ireland against England later that evening, went along these lines; Kelly: "Well as you know I always like to see the English get beat". Reporter: "So that means you're supporting Northern Ireland tonight?" Kelly: "I'm supporting the Republic". Just one example of the naked sectarian bigotry of some nationalist politicians... Sorry , but could you highlight the 'naked sectarian bigotry' in that exchange for me, CL? Posted by: Dec at October 5, 2005 01:33 PM Setanta : "If the Irish rugby team played in this new stadium would GSTQ be played ?" Yes, the IRFU have a very sensible arrangement on anthems. If the Irish team plays in the Republic, then "The Soldier's Song" is plays as the Irish anthem, if they play in Northern Irelasnd "God Save The Queen" is played as the Irish anthem. They also play "Ireland's Call" as the team anthem. Up to the early 1950s the Irish team used to regularly play games at Ravenhill, but today it only tends to be the odd underage game. Posted by: Keith M at October 5, 2005 01:36 PM slug, CL, Supremely arrogant of you methinks. Posted by: George at October 5, 2005 01:44 PM Keith - I'd be willing to bet a small fortune that if and when any Ireland rugby games are played at the new stadium in Belfast, the IRFU's policy will miraculously change! Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 02:02 PM First draft needs a lot of work..... Oh Norn Iron, the people, they are calling Posted by: Dessertspoon at October 5, 2005 02:14 PM "the greater majority of fans can not be expected to submit to the tearful undemocratic moaning of the minority in matters which do not interfere with their rights.." That kind of sums up the attitude methinks. All the talk about Northern Ireland soccer team being a team for the whole community is just that - talk. No one is saying that GSTQ is interfering with my rights. And I'm not offended by it. But I'm an Irish citizen living in NI and it's a pity that the so-called 'national' team for where I live can't understand that. Again, not offending people isn't enough to encourage them to be part of something. And Ian K - you ask the ludicrous question 'why will players from the North stand for the National Anthem suring the International Rules series when they are not from the Irish Republic?' I imagine you'll find that each and every one of them are Irish citizens. This equality thing just isn't sinking in, is it? Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 02:16 PM Northern FF - "And Ian K - you ask the ludicrous question 'why will players from the North stand for the National Anthem suring the International Rules series when they are not from the Irish Republic?' I imagine you'll find that each and every one of them are Irish citizens."
I'm proud the NI team has always been comprised of all sections of our community. "I can't say that I'd turn into any major fan - I have a dislike of any sports teams that encourge catholics and Prods to support "their own" teams when they should be on the same side (ROI included)." Could you exlpain what you mean by this, I'm unsure as to what you're saying? Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 02:26 PM Of course there is also ´The Luck of the Irish´ by John Lennon up for consideration. Or what about a conciliatory one: ´We Can Work it Out´? Or what about ´You´ve got to hide your love away´ which could be dedicated equally to N.I supporters on the Falls and GAA fans on the Shankill. I´ll get me coat... Posted by: foreign correspondent at October 5, 2005 02:29 PM Mike What I'm saying is that I object to 'national' teams that recognise the border as they encourage Catholics to support one team and Protestants to support the other. That objection extends to the Republic of Ireland soccer team. Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 02:38 PM "I'm proud the NI team has always been comprised of all sections of our community." Surely then this should be reflected by the IFA's anthem policy Mike? Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 02:41 PM Northern FF - "What I'm saying is that I object to 'national' teams that recognise the border as they encourage Catholics to support one team and Protestants to support the other. That objection extends to the Republic of Ireland soccer team." I think that's extrememly unfair - it basically paints any Northern Ireland team in any sport as 'sectarian' in composition and lauds the idea of all-Ireland teams as some sort of glowing panacea against that sort of thing. For me it goes alongside those who say things like "sure why would you object to an all-Ireland team, wouldn't it be great if we could all come together in one team" - I really resent this position as it paints those who simply want to support the (cross-community) NI team as divisive, anti-reconcilation by nature. What's wrong with everyone in NI uniting behind NI teams?
I have to say, the argument I've always made for a change of anthem, aside from the belief the NI teamshould have a NI anthem, is that it's embarrassing (to me at least) seeing half our team not singing etc, when the national anthem should act as a bit of a rallying call for the team. (By the ay if I were an Irish rugby fan I'd find the similar situation a tad embarrassing too). Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 02:51 PM 'The summer's gone, and all the bonfires dying' The summer's here, and all the bonfires, cars, Irish flags are blazing Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 02:58 PM "I think that's extrememly unfair - it basically paints any Northern Ireland team in any sport as 'sectarian' in composition and lauds the idea of all-Ireland teams as some sort of glowing panacea against that sort of thing." No Mike,I haven't claimed anywhere that NI teams are inherently sectarian , nor that all-Ireland teams are are any sort of panacea. It is simply my view that the reality of life on this island is that when sporting teams recognise the border, the population split along sectarian lines to support the team 'they're supposed to'. As regards your point that the anthem should be a rallying call for the whole team and its support base, I'm with you 100%, which is why I argue that dropping GSTQ is an absolute pre-requisute if the IFA is serious about encouraging nationalists to actively suppoprt the team. By the way, with the exception of soccer, what other team field sports have a Northern Ireland team? Posted by: Northern FF at October 5, 2005 03:22 PM
We shot one
Posted by: BogExile at October 5, 2005 03:32 PM I do think an amended Danny Boy would make an excellent NI Anthem. Slugger Competition? Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 03:43 PM Londonderry Air requires too great a vocal range for most singers. Posted by: slug at October 5, 2005 04:00 PM 'Londonderry Air requires too great a vocal range for most singers.' I think it could be sung in a lower key. Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 04:07 PM Anyone know GSTQ in Ulster-Scots? I'd give that a go for the crack ;) Posted by: cladycowboy at October 5, 2005 04:09 PM May need to rethink Danny Boy after all. Interesting website http://www.standingstones.com/dannyboy.html 'To begin with, Danny Boy is one of over 100 songs composed to the same tune. The author was an English lawyer, Frederic Edward Weatherly (1848-1929), who was also a songwriter and radio entertainer. In 1910 he wrote the words and music for an unsuccessful song he called Danny Boy. In 1912 his sister-in-law in America sent him a tune called the Londonderry Air (or possibly something else, as discussed in Section 3), which he had never heard before. He immediately noticed that the melody was perfectly fitted to his Danny Boy lyrics, and published a revised version of the song in 1913. As far as is known, Weatherly never set foot in Ireland.' Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 04:15 PM 'Anyone know GSTQ in Ulster-Scots? I'd give that a go for the crack ;)' Don't ya mean 'craic'! Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 04:16 PM 'Don't ya mean 'craic'!' Ah now, that would be my spelling but sure its 'crack' in U-S,although you've just put the thought of GSTQ in Gaelic into my mind...(would anybody sing that one)! Posted by: cladycowboy at October 5, 2005 04:22 PM IanK It took all of four posts for the 'whataboutery' to get started...! If a separate anthem is good enough for Scotland and Wales, I'd've thought it good enough for NI. If the GAA wishes to remain a Nationalist-only club, let it be judged on that. That's nothing to do with soccer. Posted by: IJP at October 5, 2005 04:27 PM 'Ah now, that would be my spelling but sure its 'crack' in U-S,' I think doing it for the CRACK in the US has a TOTALLY different meaning! '...(would anybody sing that one)!' Macca could supply the lyrics! At a guess, GSTQ = Dia sábháil na Banríona Posted by: smcgiff at October 5, 2005 04:31 PM "It is simply my view that the reality of life on this island is that when sporting teams recognise the border, the population split along sectarian lines to support the team 'they're supposed to'." I don't believe that necessarily has to be the case. And I think those who would refuse to support a NI team simply because it's NI team are responsible for their own position - as indeed there are some people who would not support all-Ireland teams. "By the way, with the exception of soccer, what other team field sports have a Northern Ireland team?" The only other team field sports I can think of at all (exclsuing gaelic games which don't really have an international game and are overseen by a nationalist organisation) are rugby union, hockey, cricket (which have all-Ireland teams - though rugby union also has a British-Irish touring side, and in hockey players from NI can opt to play for Great Britain or Ireland)) and rugby league (which has a British Isles team). I don't see why this should have any bearing on football though, any more than the fact that England and Wales being combined in cricket means they should have a combined rugby team, or there being a Great Britain and Northern Ireland athletics team mean there should be a combined UK football team. Posted by: Mike at October 5, 2005 05:28 PM Well, GSTQ can Go To F*ck - I am never standing up to a song with rebellious Scots to crush lyrics. If NI want a separate identity for the footie team it is puzzlling that they need GSTQ - Which is supposibly the British National anthem - and the region of NI is not Britain (whole) - so time to come up with a new ditty .It is an amusing argument - NI can't have too Irish a tune but at same time it is somewhat anchronistic in a devolved UK to resort to a Georgian dirge - will the real NI cultural idenity stand up and nominate a tune? Posted by: looking in at October 5, 2005 11:12 PM George Perhaps you viewed my contribution through green tinted spectacles-I did not refer to the Maze project as a national stadium-choosing deliberately the term multi-purpose stadium to avoid offending anyone's sensitivities. In the future United Ireland which you so earnestly seek will people of a Unionist persuasion be required to live under the tricolour and have the "Soldiers Song" as their anthem or will those emblems and other institutions of "26 county" Ireland be hurriedly changed to accomodate the 1.1million Protestants who are to be absorbed into your dream country. It is time Republicans adopted the sort of pragmatic approach one hears from Alistair McDonnell which is about accepting present demographic and political realities and working to build a better Northern Ireland for all our people. Posted by: T.Ruth at October 6, 2005 10:04 AM fairly straightforward argument in my view, any NI sporting occasion should be representitve of NI, and if there is a stand alone anthem to support that great. What it should not be is an occasion to demonstrate that NI is a part of UK, I cant see why anyone would have a problem with this? There is plenty of other outlets to express Britishness/Irishness or whatever or "ess" you want. personally I feel embarrased wheneverGSTQ is played I mean are we that incapable we cant come up with a song for ourselves. also think GSTQ remains an outlet for the knuckle draggers among NI support to shout No surrender - this has gone way down thanks to Football for all etc and the efforts of NI fans in particular but why keep it? Leaving the GAA/IRFU/NASA/UN out of this (they can look after themselves) can somebody explain to me the downside of changing the anthem? Posted by: TOT at October 6, 2005 10:04 AM If the National Anthem is changed to a new, sporting anthem for Northern Ireland games (something which I favour strongly), what excuse will nationalists have then for not supporting their local team? Posted by: Realist at October 6, 2005 12:15 PM 'what excuse will nationalists have then for not supporting their local team?' It just aint cricket! ;-) Posted by: smcgiff at October 6, 2005 12:27 PM T.Ruth, "In the future United Ireland which you so earnestly seek will people of a Unionist persuasion be required to live under the tricolour and have the "Soldiers Song" as their anthem or will those emblems and other institutions of "26 county" Ireland be hurriedly changed to accomodate the 1.1million Protestants who are to be absorbed into your dream country." That is for the people of Ireland to decide if that day comes, not me. As a citizen, it is for me to live with the democratic wishes of the people of Ireland. If they want Rudolf the Red-nosed Reindeer as the national anthem, I won't be happy but I'll live it. There are around 700,000 Protestants to be "absorbed" as you put it, not 1.1 million. The bomb and ballot republicans won 5 out of 166 seats where I come from so that is their relevance to the Irish Republic in 2005. If the IRA has really gone and the bomb is gone then SF might get more next time around. Looking to the future, I live in hope that one day unionists do work to build a better Ireland and not just a better Northern Ireland. Pragmatism doesn't stop at the border. I look forward to the day unionism respects my country and my country's symbols. But if the majority in Northern Ireland see a better Northern Ireland can only come about as part of a unitary Irish state, I will not be the one to say "not in my lifetime". Unity of purpose should not preclude unity just as it should not preclude the continuation of partition. You want to solve the massive problems but that means you have to keep all options open, including unification. That said, you'd be surprised at how many southerners are rooting for you to succeed in making this partition thing last a bit longer. Posted by: George at October 6, 2005 12:49 PM George Posted by: T.Ruth at October 7, 2005 02:31 PM More on the "Danny Boy issue. Malachy McCourt (brother of Frank) even wrote a book on the subject. It says the song was "recorded by everyone from Tony Bennett to Joan Baez to Black 47." That's enough to give one pause right there. Posted by: Alan McDonald at October 7, 2005 02:50 PM Equal partners, eh? Let's put that down to the test. You say you want to march down my street. The residents of my street say no. What happens then? Posted by: Dec at October 7, 2005 02:51 PM 'What happens then?' I'm guessing it's too much to expect everyone to get a life? Posted by: smcgiff at October 7, 2005 03:10 PM Northern FF Sorry Ian K, that well worn line doesn't wash - at GAA games, none of the teams claim to represent the nation. They are instead part of a national sporting movement and as such the playing of the national anthem is entirely understandable and welcome. But why is the Southern anthem played in Northern Ireland? But I'm an Irish citizen living in NI and it's a pity that the so-called 'national' team for where I live can't understand that. You mean you're an ROI citizen living in NI. If you lived in Scotland, would you expect the 'national' team for Scotland to "understand that", presumably by playing a different anthem? What I'm saying is that I object to 'national' teams that recognise the border as they encourage Catholics to support one team and Protestants to support the other. That objection extends to the Republic of Ireland soccer team. So, you expect unionists to be magnanimous and to support an all-Ireland team, yet nationalists should not be expected magnanimously to support a NI team? That is terrible hypocrisy.
Question, If the Irish rugby team played in this new stadium would GSTQ be played ? According to IRFU policy, then, yes, it would. I imagine they would desperately try and change the policy, though, if the prospect looked like it was going to become reality. Flying the Tricolor at GAA games in the sick counties is just a fact of life. The GAA is an Irish cultural and sporting organisation and i dare say the flag is the national flag of all Gaels. All "Gaels" - what's with this seemingly racist distinction? If the GAA is an Irish "cultural and sporting organisation", presumably this covers the whole island, and not just the Republic?
Posted by: willowfield at October 10, 2005 09:33 PM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.