Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture

You are here
Home | Culture | word, light, man, woman, begat, begat, begat..


Next or Previous
« Water rates: equalisation or punishment? | Main | Handbook on blogging censorship... »




SOS - Save Our Slugger!

Help fund Slugger's new software:

Or mail it direct to Slugger!



word, light, man, woman, begat, begat, begat..
Now, I'm not a religious man.. at all [whodathunkit? - Ed], but even I think this is a ludicrous idea. The Times covers the 100-minute Bible here, but the Guardian has a rather telling quote from the publisher, Len Budd, a former chairman of the deanery at Canterbury "Is it a dumbing down of the Bible? Yes, but that's the world today... If this book means more people can answer pub quiz questions on the Bible, so much the better."

The man responsible for condensing the Bible, Rev Martin Hinton, has claimed - "We have sacrificed poetry to clarity."

And, as a comparison, here is a sample from the 100-minute Bible, and the King James Bible's version of the same sermon on the mount

Also worth reading is The Guardian's John Crace [he called the 100-minute version the Ronseal edition: “It says 100 minutes on the tin and that’s what it is."] - The 'If you don't have 100 minutes version' -

God created heaven and earth in six days. He then made Adam, quickly followed by Eve when he saw that Adam was bored. Their descendants proved a real disappointment, so he flooded the world and started again.

But I'll pick out one of the submissions to the G's Newsblog -

word, light, man, woman, begat, begat, begat, flood, 10 rules, big wall, trumpet, more rules, rainbow robe, shepherd, star, carpenter, do unto others, fish in a basket, gone-but not for long, convert, convert, convert, 4 horsemen

Amen.


Comments (25)

The 10 second version of the bible.

A long time ago, in a land far far away... We will all live happily ever after (except the ones that are not of our religion - but they don't deserve to!).

Posted by: smcgiff at September 22, 2005 03:35 PM


However, if the bible being translated from Latin to the current accepted ‘English’ bible was such a huge thing, which it surely was, then the updating of the bible to the 21st century English should be equally welcome.

The sample as given was well put, but I wonder if it loses impact without the 'Thou' and 'Behold' type words, which ironically was partially the reason the RC church didn't want it translated into 'English' in the first place.

Posted by: smcgiff at September 22, 2005 03:42 PM


Even the publisher isn't strictly claiming it to be an updating of the Bible, smcgiff... he called it a dumbing down.. justifying that by claiming that the modern world has dumbed down.

That, I suggest, is an under-estimating [or at least a misunderstanding] of the modern world.

Posted by: peteb at September 22, 2005 03:51 PM


I'm a Christian and have no problem at all with this.

The NT is not the word of Jesus, but the words of Jesus remembered (and probably half-remembered half the time) by men writing decades later.

If the gist of it is there, and people can learn a little love from it, then that's good enough for me.

Posted by: Denny Boy at September 22, 2005 03:55 PM


'justifying that by claiming that the modern world has dumbed down.'

It's only a matter of time (even if its geological terms) before the bible is updated for modern usage. The sooner the better and hopefully it wont take a schism this time.

Posted by: smcgiff at September 22, 2005 04:01 PM


Denny Boy.. here's a good example of the gist of it, again from the G's Newsblog -

Announcement

GOD is pleased to announce that, after a long period of mutual misunderstanding (including, and in particular, the regrettable incident during which His son was nailed to a piece of wood) and all appearances to the contrary, relations between Himself and humanity have now been normalised and everything will turn out all right in the end so long as EVERYBODY BEHAVES HIM OR HERSELF (see Addendum).

Love
God (and Jesus sends his regards, you naughty people)

Addendum

The Rules (abbreviated form)

1. Nobody moves, nobody gets hurt.
2. Don’t even think about it.

Posted by: peteb at September 22, 2005 04:10 PM


peteb

:0)

Posted by: Denny Boy at September 22, 2005 04:17 PM


I never understand the problem people have with the old Bible, they always say "those thous and thees...sure young people can't understand it", but I ask why? I understood it perfectly when I was a kid and I was no Einstein, as did generations before me, what's the problem with young people today? I mean it can't be because they're more stupid than we were, after all we hear every August about the fantastic exam results they keep getting, so if they're so damn brainy why can't they understand the Bible?

I think the King James Bible contains some of the most beautiful language ever in the canon of English writing. I'm not a Prod by the way, heck I'm not even a Christian any more, but when we were wee'uns in Derry we had absolutely no difficulty understanding what 'thou' and 'thee' meant, it wasn't exactly rocket science. So what is it with the yoof today who seem to have no difficulty comprhending the utter gobbledygook of rap lyrics that they have a problem with the language in the Bible?

No, leave the Bible alone, don't dumb it down, you won't get one single extra believer but leave it there on the shelf it will be remarkable how when someone eventually needs it they will be able to take it down and comprehend its magnificently sublime message without any problems at all.

Posted by: Harry Flashman at September 22, 2005 04:35 PM


Maybe the world is not being dumbed-down per se, but I do think that there is an increasingly consumerist attitude to everything. Texts become mere "information," and we're all plugged into our Bluetooths saying things like "just gimme the executive summary." Our sense of self-importance bloats and art, nuance, subtlety, degree and shading are all victims. That makes us all a little more stupid.

And the very idea that there'll be "christians" running about with the executive summary version of the bible scares the shite out of me. More doctrinaire, more moral absolutism, more black and white christianity is just what the world needs like a hole in the head.

Posted by: Yoda at September 22, 2005 04:40 PM


Well, I've got my favourite sin down to about three minutes, so it's only right and proper that those who want to chastise me speed up the process as well.

Posted by: TAFKABO at September 22, 2005 04:52 PM


TAFKABO

Well, I've got my favourite sin down to about three minutes

I noticed your posts were getting shorter.

Posted by: Henry94 at September 22, 2005 04:56 PM


DennyBoy

Your post puts me in mind of another approach to Bible streamlining taken by Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson produced a compilation "The Life and Morals of Jesus of Nazareth", in which he cut out all the references to genealogy, miracles, resurrections and greek and platonic influences (please don't ask me what these last two are).

According to Jefferson he was rescuing the philosophy of Jesus and the "pure principles which he taught," from the "artificial vestments in which they have been muffled by priests, who have travestied them into various forms as instruments of riches and power for themselves."

and

"abstracting what is really his from the rubbish in which it is buried, easily distinguished by its lustre from the dross of his biographers, and as separate from that as the diamond from the dung hill."

I'm not completely sure meself. My kids think the best bits are those with the animals in - floods and whales and the like.

Posted by: anne dunne at September 22, 2005 05:48 PM


This 'new' Bible is actually a summary rather than a translation.

If it prompts people to link to the real thing,
to read more, it will have accomplished a lot.

Posted by: 6countyprod at September 22, 2005 06:13 PM


Jaysus, lads/lassies,

Ye'd have been the very people to claim the Latin bible was fine the way it was.

Talk about poachers becoming gamekeepers!

Posted by: smcgiff at September 22, 2005 06:17 PM


What's next? The Mona Lisa as a Smiley Face with Hair? I'm a Catholic, but the KJV is beautiful English. What happens to the 23rd Psalm? My cup runneth over becomes I spilled my pint? Poetry lifts the spirit beyond mere words giving you "info."

Posted by: ch in dallas at September 22, 2005 06:33 PM


Ye'd have been the very people to claim the Latin bible was fine the way it was.

Personally, I don't read any of them.

Posted by: Yoda at September 22, 2005 06:40 PM


Do the Jedi not have a Bible?

Posted by: anne dunne at September 22, 2005 06:55 PM


Touchè Henry.

If I don't stop it I'm sure to go blind.

Posted by: TAFKABO at September 22, 2005 07:17 PM


Of bibles I have no need. Too cute and green am I. Mmm. Yes.

Posted by: Yoda at September 22, 2005 07:18 PM


When can we expect the film of the book? Is Mel Gibson interested?

Posted by: Whatabout at September 22, 2005 07:56 PM


No, it will be Austin Pendleton in the movie version. See his work as The Fifteen Minute Hamlet.

Posted by: Alan McDonald at September 22, 2005 08:35 PM


The only bible worth reading is the one by Spike Milligan. Some quotes:

And the Lord called Moses unto the mountain, and Moses trmbled because the walk to the top of the mountain shaggeth him out. He was with the Lord forty days and forty nights, he ate not bread and drank not water, and he loseth weight and, lo, his trousers falleth down. The Lord liked not what he saw. "Tis a small thing, but mine own," said Moses

Jacob goeth and chose a wife: one of the daughters of Heth.
"Which one will you have?" said Heth
And Jacob said, "The one with the big tits"

Classic stuff.

Posted by: maca at September 22, 2005 08:38 PM


Maca

Would that be in the Prodestant Bible or the Fenian one (Douay-Rheims)? :>)

Posted by: born-again at September 22, 2005 09:50 PM


...then begat begot a bigot...

Posted by: ganching at September 23, 2005 12:51 PM


Can we now expect the 'new improved koran without the nasty bits about women and infidels' and the 'pamphlet of mormon'?

Posted by: Gerry Lvs Castro at September 23, 2005 02:39 PM



NOTE: When adding hyperlinks, please follow this format:
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.

Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland.

Produced by Mick Fealty
Designed by River Path

News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com
(change "-at-" to "@")

Commenting Policy


Topics
a long peace?
books
Britain
Conflict
Culture
Economy
Education
election 2003
Election 2005
Enviroment
environment
Europe
Gaeilge
Glossary
Government
Highlights
Human Rights
Humour
International
Manifesto
Media
Nationalism
Negotiations
Parties
Policing
Soapbox
Society
Sport
the south
unionism

Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...
Just a Mo...
Commenting Policy
A backgrounder on the McCartney affair
Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far

Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)
Living on an island or in a state? - (31)
a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42)
Payout time... - (4)
New Lansdowne revealed - (24)
Far right 'imagination'... - (13)
Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3)
The price of peacemaking... - (17)
belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23)
Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)


Archives
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
March 2004
October 2003
September 2003
May 2003



Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered: Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com All rights reserved.