![]() |
|
You are here Home | Policing | Vice-Chairman of Policing Board attacked Next or Previous « What is a bigot? | Main | ASA freezes South Armagh assets »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 21, 2005 Vice-Chairman of Policing Board attacked The vice-chairman of the Policing Board, Denis Bradley, was attacked last night, while watching a football match in a bar in Derry with his son, by a masked man wielding what has been described as a cut-down baseball bat. The reality, and ongoing problem, is that certain groups continue to believe they can commit such attacks with impunity. Btw, the only arrest, so far, is for disorderly behaviour in relation to the attacks on police investigating the assault. "Ulster Unionists described the attack as unjustifiable, while Sinn Féin's Martin McGuinness said Mr Bradley's membership of the policing board did not warrant an attack on him or his family." All of which begs the questions: a. When would such an attack be justifiable in the eyes of Ulster Unionists? and b. When would Mr Bradley's being or behaviour, in the opinion of Martin McGuinnes, warrant an attack ? Jeeze! Posted by: Denny Boy at September 21, 2005 03:40 PM Denny Boy, Answer to a: When Belfast roadblocking loyalists/ spides are involved, and Answer to b: When he has been found 'guilty' by an IRA 'court-martial' i.e. when it suits them. Posted by: El Matador @ El Blogador at September 21, 2005 03:51 PM Denny Boy For the record i do not believe that Mar Sinn Féin Chief Negotiator Martin McGuinness MP has said that the attack on Denis Bradley was wrong and must be condemned. Speaking after visiting Denis Bradley in Hospital last night Mr McGuinness said: "The attack on Denis Bradley was wrong and unacceptable and must be condemned. "The fact that he is the vice Chairperson of the Policing Board does not warrant an attack on either him or his family. "I am glad to hear that his injuries are not life threatening and hope that he makes a full recovery." Posted by: J Kelly at September 21, 2005 04:03 PM Thanks for clearing that up, Mr Kelly. There's hope yet.... Posted by: Denny Boy at September 21, 2005 04:15 PM Denny Boy, don't you think you were just splitting hairs/looking for something that wasn't there? Even a wee bit. I also heard Willie Hay on TV earlier say his and Mr Bradley's politics/attitudes would differ a lot, but he (Hay) totally condemned the attack. All of the reaction I have read and heard on this is of total opposition to what happened and sympathy for/best wishes to Mr Bradley. It is possible to be too forensic, is it not? I would be more worried by the petrol bombs, etc, ready to hand to attack the police with - reminicsent in small scale of the sort of pre-planning we saw in Woodvale lately. The attack on Mr Bradley may have been opportunistic, but the rioting that followed would appear not to have been. And only one arrest. Heavy-handedness again! Posted by: GavBelfast at September 21, 2005 04:31 PM To be fair,there was no equivocation at all in Martin McGuiness's statement. Denis Bradley has made a massive contribution to the civic life of Derry over the years, massive, not just with the Police Board but in a huge range of areas. I wonder what contribution his cowardly attacker has made. Posted by: pacart at September 21, 2005 04:43 PM Denny That was my first reaction too. When I thought about it for a bit and read the whole thing, though, I came to the view that a statement condemning the attack and declaring it unjustifiable from the single most iconic living figure in militant republicanism cannot be a bad thing, and can only have a dissuasive effect on copycats. I'd say there are DPP members around the country sleeping more soundly for MMcG's statement. Hospital visit was interesting too. They must have talkd about whodunnit. SF's first engagement with the Policing Board? Posted by: middle-class taig at September 21, 2005 04:50 PM Yes, I guess I was splitting hairs. This was my angry response to what I perceived as the usual going-through-the-motions condemnatory soundbites. My tailor is measuring me for a sackcloth-and-ashes suit even as we speak. I'm also glad Martin McGuinness came out with those robust comments. It gives me hope that NI politics have indeed turned a corner. Posted by: Denny Boy at September 21, 2005 05:14 PM As somebody has just said on MarkdotPatterson's programme [just for the privileged on Radio Foyle!] either somebody was in the bar, went home and changed for beating-up duties or else tipped off somebody else to come and do it. An "opportunity arose" apparently. Carpe diem indeed. And Denis Bradley's son was with him when it happened. Horrendous.
I wish him well. Posted by: Feismother at September 21, 2005 05:22 PM Well I guess this, along with the ongoing terrorising & intimidation of the McCartney sisters, belies the idea that everything that's going on in NI at present is a macchiavellian RM-controlled PR exercise, and that the RM would be clever enough to keep their spides under control so as to capitalise (should that be capitOlise?) on the negative image the OO and Unionism in general managed to project over the last fortnight. What a bunch of utter losers. Posted by: Dandyman at September 21, 2005 05:37 PM Danny boy,
Posted by: pol at September 21, 2005 07:17 PM Jeeze, pol, easy does it! My tailor can only work so fast. I thought of going to Hong Kong, but since the Brits moved out it's impossible to find the right sort of ashes. Posted by: Denny Boy at September 21, 2005 07:28 PM 'The vicious assault Tuesday on Denis Bradley demonstrated once again the powerlessness of violence. The incident will help seal the political fate of those who beckon us to an ugly future tainted by a fundamental disrespect today for human rights, freedom of speech, and democratic choice. Posted by: Green Party at September 21, 2005 08:21 PM Frankly in a conflict with very few decent people, I was saddened but hardly surprised by the attack on DB. More power to him that he was not going to let the begrudgers win. I wish him a speedy recovery. Posted by: willis at September 21, 2005 11:29 PM Pol, As an American who might someday visit Northern Ireland, I have a request. When you say "in the north there is places you just don't go," can you tell me exactly where these places are so that I can avoid being hit with a baseball bat? Thank you in advance. Posted by: Alan McDonald at September 22, 2005 12:15 AM Don't go the route of serving the wider interest of the whole community or mix with both sides. Don't tell it as you see it. Just make money or keep to the middle of one ghetto or the other and you should be safe enough. You could get elected and have your security arranged by the state no matter what hatred you foment, although that option is not open to american citizens, unless your granny was irish. Posted by: aquifer at September 22, 2005 07:27 AM Aquifer, very sad but very true. Just being a decent human being is dangerous in some areas. Posted by: pacart at September 22, 2005 09:38 AM Alan Reading Pol's piece carefully, he is making the point that as a moderate nationalist who openly supports the PSNI, Denis Bradley perhaps should not have ventured into that particular bar.While I see the sense of the argument, (and I tend not to drink on the Newtownards Road myself,) I find it a dangerous but realsitic comment on life in Northern Ireland. Sadly, this is a place where, if you live here permanently, you have to think twice about where you live, shop, drink and work. Posted by: missfitz at September 22, 2005 10:03 AM Pol Extrapolating from your logic, it was DB's own fault that he got beaten up for having the temerity to watch a football match in his own city. Sure, if he was a thinking man, at all, he would have beaten himself up before leaving the house to save the hooded scumbag the bother of carrying the bat. Posted by: Plum Duff at September 22, 2005 10:07 AM Pol and Missiftx, I think you are being somewhat disengious with your "no go areas" comment. First up, do you think Mr Bradley and his son just drove about until they found a random pub to watch the game? i dont know the circumstances but for them to blithely wander into a "no go" pub seems of the mark, I think they'd be able to judge that for themselves. It's distinctly not like other cities where there are rough pubs you wouldn't walk in wearing the wrong football colours or whatever. Secondly, This wasnt some random act of violence, some pub brawl. Someone recognised him and either went out and got a bat and mask or phoned someone else to do it. Why? because of the guys job? because he supports the PSNI? Was this one guy with a grudge or is there something more sinister? Did he just think "oh there Mr Bradley I think I'll hospitalise him" or was it "I've been looking for the oppertunity to hospitalise him for ages now" Posted by: Jocky at September 22, 2005 10:41 AM Pol and Missiftx, I think you are being somewhat disengious with your "no go areas" comment. I don't think I'm being disingenuous. I just think i live in the real world. you say you don't know the circumstances of what happened, well there's a good place to start.
Posted by: pol at September 22, 2005 11:50 PM Plum Duff All but a few looneys here in Derry were sickened at Denis' ordeal and, simultaneously, we were surprised that Denis felt he'd be safe in that bar. Its disingenuous for you to assert that criticism of his bar selection skills ensured that the critics made Denis culpable for his assault. Posted by: Gummo at September 22, 2005 11:52 PM alan mc donald You would be welcomed in my town anytime. Posted by: pol at September 23, 2005 12:39 AM Pol, Thanks for the invitation. My wife wants to go, but I think it's not safe enough yet. I have had "no go" advice in the States, and sometimes I've followed it. When I didn't, sometimes I had to run and sometimes I didn't run fast enough. I've also been in a "yes go" bar where nothing should have happened, and got accosted by an angry drunk. My reading of the incident in question is that it was directed at Denis Bradley because of who he was not where he was. Posted by: Alan McDonald at September 23, 2005 01:29 AM Alan, you are right in this case. However, in my very extensive experience of drinking establishments around the world, any bar that is a no-go for any particular person, or group of people, is invariably a complete shithole you wouldn't to be caught dead in anyway. Bigotry and good times just don't go together. You can put that in your rulebook of life. Posted by: pacart at September 24, 2005 12:04 AM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.