![]() |
|
You are here Home | Conflict | UVF sends children to fight police... Next or Previous « Washing his hands of the decision? | Main | Biogas: elegant energy solution for Ireland? »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 07, 2005 UVF sends children to fight police... A CHILD of five has been cautioned by police for being involved in serious rioting in the Shankill area of north Belfast. Police say the kids are organising their "recreational riots" using mobile phone text messages, without outside (school) involvement. The riots, too late to make the latest IMC report, ostensibly were the "community response" to "heavy-handed policing" during house searches. The searches - carried out in the wake of a UVF "show of strength" - turned up a gun and there were arrests, and more after the riot. The PSNI think they're in an impossible position - too heavy-handed for some, too much of a soft touch for others, and all the while trying to ensure the human rights of a child throwning a petrol bomb at them are upheld. Meanwhile, looking at the problem of sectarian attacks in north Antrim, also believed to have been carried out by children, Angelique Chrisafis wonders if "a generation is growing up more segregated and sectarian than its parents". At least the PSNI appear to have been working on their arrest techniques in riot situations because they actually managed to catch one of these nimble five-year-olds, who wasn't able to run as fast as his school mates who got away. A bit more speed work in the gymn from the officers and who knows, the streets of Belfast may one day be safe. Posted by: George at September 7, 2005 12:21 PM The parents of that 5 year old shouldn't be allowed to have kids. Someone call child services. Posted by: maca at September 7, 2005 12:32 PM Without reading Chrisafis' article, I'd say the upcoming generation is probably more disaffected than most of us. I think it's down to the ethos in some of these 'worse-off' areas - run-down housing estates, idle, aimless parents just living with no thought for the future. We're watching the birth of a parentally-detatched, junk-food eating, TV watching generation. Oh, and don't forget the rampant sectarian attitudes. Nothing seems to hold any excitement or attraction for these kids, so a bit of rioting hits the spot, doesn't it? So, instead of criticising the police, the parents and politicians in these areas need to take a long hard look at what they're doing for their youngsters. Disclaimer: Having lived and grown up in council housing, particularly in West Belfast, I know the kind of people I'm talking about here. There are decent folk living in these areas too, but they get on with lives quietly. Posted by: levee at September 7, 2005 12:43 PM "The parents of that 5 year old shouldn't be allowed to have kids. Someone call child services." Didn't know you were in the eugenics camp Maca. Posted by: George at September 7, 2005 01:05 PM Nothing to do with eugenics UI, more to do with questioning how responsible some parents are. Posted by: maca at September 7, 2005 01:14 PM Indeed, where are the parents in this situation? It seems clear that these children who are neglected are making their own entertainment. The police should not be forced to be babysitters. Posted by: Animus at September 7, 2005 01:16 PM "Irresponsibility", as you call it, shouldn't deny them the right to procreate maca. And what does the UI mean? Posted by: George at September 7, 2005 01:25 PM George It was a poor choice of words on my part George, I don't mean I'd deny them the right to procreate, I meant that if they can't look after their kids then perhaps social services might want to take a look at their situation. "And what does the UI mean?" Posted by: maca at September 7, 2005 01:31 PM We're watching the birth of a parentally-detatched, junk-food eating, TV watching generation. That was said about my generation. And my parents' generation. And my grand-parents' generation, except it was the pictures and comics rather than TV. Wherever the blame lies, it's not with those old chestnuts. Pretty shocking all the same - I wonder what sanctions will be imposed on the five year old and his parents? Posted by: Young Fogey at September 7, 2005 02:02 PM Young Fogey, Posted by: George at September 7, 2005 02:05 PM The generation of empathetic deficient. Posted by: Angel at September 7, 2005 02:14 PM the parents of these kids arent going to do an aweful lot about about their kids behaviour. the only way to stop kids / teens rioting, that i can see, would be for the police to beat the living tripe out of the rioters ! rendering them unable to riot ! unfortunately this probably wouldnt be socially acceptable... Posted by: eranu at September 7, 2005 02:19 PM Eranu - Children learn from example - a five year old needs guidance, not a beating from police. A teenager is a different story, but if you can't control your five year old, perhaps you should let someone else (like foster parents) have a go. Angel - how do you mean the job market goes down? We are in a period of low unemployment, although some of the jobs on offer aren't great. And as for working parents - you have constructed a very limited scenario, don't you think? Many mothers enjoy the opportunities (and money) work brings and don't have to resort to drink or drugs! Most children's parents work these days, but most five year olds aren't rioting. Lots of statements there, but they just don't make sense as a package. Posted by: Animus at September 7, 2005 04:28 PM Animus, Two years later they were back, two years older and two years angrier, highly organised young adults burning down supermarkets and returning the violence in spades. Posted by: George at September 7, 2005 05:00 PM i think a 5 year old definately needs proper guidance too. especially if at 5 years old they arent afraid of throwing stones etc at adults (police) . our rioters arent attending an event and decide to cause trouble at it, they are simpley going out into the street to riot, to cause damage and try to hurt police officers.
Posted by: eranu at September 7, 2005 05:44 PM George - I left out the word parental, sorry, children of five need more parental guidance, whereas teenagers are slightly harder to rein in by parents. The peer group is more influential as one gets older and teenagers naturally assert their independence, although certainly I would prefer them to dye their hair blue/swear/listen to loud music rather than rioting or carjacking.
Posted by: Animus at September 7, 2005 05:45 PM George - I left out the word parental, sorry, children of five need more parental guidance, whereas teenagers are slightly harder to rein in by parents. The peer group is more influential as one gets older and teenagers naturally assert their independence, although certainly I would prefer them to dye their hair blue/swear/listen to loud music rather than rioting or carjacking.
Posted by: Animus at September 7, 2005 05:46 PM Isn't it a bit weird that our political agenda is,in part, being set by five year olds? Posted by: pacart at September 7, 2005 08:08 PM no 5 year olds on the television coverage. All grown ups throwing petrol bombs on the tv pics.
Posted by: davey at September 8, 2005 11:14 PM "At least the PSNI appear to have been working on their arrest techniques in riot situations because they actually managed to catch one of these nimble five-year-olds, who wasn't able to run as fast as his school mates who got away." He was however released without charge due to the intervention of his special branch handler Posted by: raymond at September 8, 2005 11:36 PM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.