![]() |
|
You are here Home | Conflict | The breadth and depth of the IRA's arsenal Next or Previous « IRA must also give up summary violence | Main | we should probably juggle at this point »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 28, 2005 The breadth and depth of the IRA's arsenal Chris Thornton has been ruminating on the fast moving events of Monday pm, and traces what details that actually did emerge despite the General's concern to maintain a degree of secrecy. It included a flame thrower. I can't remember that one ever reported being used! There is no example of a flame thrower being used but one was recovered in a weapons seizure by the RUC. Posted by: fair_deal at September 28, 2005 12:25 PM A flame thrower was used in the late 80's along with a heavy machine gun and van bomb in a co-ordinated attack attack against a Fermanagh border post. Two soldiers died, a number were injured and the post destroyed. Posted by: Blather at September 28, 2005 12:33 PM A flame thrower was used in the late 80's along with a heavy machine gun and van bomb in a co-ordinated attack attack against a Fermanagh border post. Two soldiers died, a number were injured and the post destroyed. Posted by: Blather at September 28, 2005 12:33 PM i stand corrected. I remember the attack just didn't realise they'd used a flame thrower Posted by: fair_deal at September 28, 2005 12:54 PM The public estimates I have found claim the IRA had 300k rounds of ammunition and it is claimed they decommissioned 700k to 800k rounds. dC reckons that if they handed in that amount of ammo then they must have handed in all the guns because what is the point of having a gun without any ammo. Does anyone have a link to the (un)official security source estimates that give a different estimate of ammo held by the IRA? Posted by: Robert Keogh at September 28, 2005 03:42 PM An estimated inventory can be found here: http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/ira/inside/weapons.html I saw a similar inventory in Magill magazine a few years back. Much of the intelligence is based on information passed by the Libyans to the British in recent years. Posted by: paddy ó duibhir at September 28, 2005 05:03 PM paddy, the frontline link doesn't contain an estimate of the number of rounds of ammunition the PIRA held. I've found a few that list weapons but nothing that says the PIRA had more than 300k rounds. Posted by: Robert Keogh at September 28, 2005 05:21 PM Does anyone recall an incident where a flame thrower was used by a loyalist in an attack on a catholic school? I have some vague recollection but don't recall the specifics. Posted by: Crow at September 28, 2005 07:05 PM I don't think so crow Them boys wouldn't have realised you had to light it first. Posted by: zorr at September 28, 2005 07:22 PM You are probably thinking about the maniac who went into the assembly hall of a school in Bangor (or somewhere) and burned some children. He was an ex pupil as far as i remember and it wasn't sectarian. F**king scumbag Posted by: zorr at September 28, 2005 07:28 PM Crow, as Zorr has suggested, you were probably thinking of something else. The culprit concerned appears to have had a grudge and died of natual causes in secure custody some years ago. Why did you think it was a loyalist attack on a Catholic school? Memories here do seem to play awful tricks, leading to hand-me-down stories and further bitterness, which is hardly helpful.
Posted by: GavBelfast at September 28, 2005 10:17 PM As I recall the incident at the check point involved a slurry tanker adapted to act as a flame thrower rather than an actual purpose built one. What surprises me is that no one has commented on the SAM missile, I always understood that was the Holy Grail for the provies and when they got that the Brits would be beat a la Afghanistan and the Russkies. Posted by: harry flashman at September 29, 2005 02:22 AM Regarding the SAM: Posted by: greener fields at September 29, 2005 04:58 AM The converted slurry tanker operation happened in an attack on the Borouki Sangar in Crossmaglen and is unconnected to the flamethrower attack in Fermanagh. When the IRA was striving to get hold of Red Eye surface to air missiles in the US they were able to sent weaponary experts who knew these devices incide out, one of whom was arrested and jailed in an FBI sting, therefore military capability was not the reason that the SAM missiles were not used. Posted by: JD at September 29, 2005 09:35 AM I stand corrected, as I remember the Fermanagh attack it was a real humdinger of an assault, with all sorts of weaponry involved and which lasted for some time. Although it seemed to receive little attention at the time despite the deaths of two soldiers. I think afterwards the army took to mounting heavy machine guns on their helis and issuing rocket launcers to troops based in the border check points. As regards the SAMs I reckon ol' Ghaddafi would have given them the instruction booklets, after all they were designed to be used by Russian conscripts and half literate mujhahadeen so they can't have been that complicated. Posted by: harry flashman at September 29, 2005 10:23 AM 1,000 rifles Source: Security estimates/Jane's Intelligence Review http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/4284048.stm Posted by: maca at September 29, 2005 10:23 AM Were there not several reports of unsuccuessful attempts to bring down helicopters in S Armagh in particular with SAM7s, pilots seeing vapour trails etc which led to IR supressing exhausts being fitted? These in turn caused cancer scares among local school kids etc etc etc Posted by: PeterBrown at September 29, 2005 01:17 PM I guess they did use one before: http://www.impartialreporter.com/cgi-bin/index?story=2586&issue=104&treeid= Posted by: greener fields at September 29, 2005 07:38 PM IRA/Sinn Fein planned decommissioning years ago. It was all set up. FL arms route was designed to resupply decommissioned weapons. "Offensive" and obsolete weapons to be replaced with shorts that were clean/no ballistics. At some point, believe the Brits even approved retention of these weapons as 1)deterrent to dissident republicans Posted by: Sunny at September 30, 2005 12:31 AM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.