Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture

You are here
Home | Policing | Orde says no to Provo Police...


Next or Previous
« Amnesty proposals questioned... | Main | Going gaa-gaa over flags... »




SOS - Save Our Slugger!

Help fund Slugger's new software:

Or mail it direct to Slugger!



Orde says no to Provo Police...
CHIEF Constable Hugh Orde and Policing Board chairman Des Rea both insisted yesterday that people with terrorist convictions will not be allowed to join the police.

Comments (17)

This is not Hugh Orde's call and he knows it, but once again this top political cop can't resist grabbing a headline. Nationalists who felt Hugh Orde embodied a new beginning policing need to take a look at themselves.

Posted by: JD at September 2, 2005 12:52 PM


Hugh, me oul' chum,
You'll have to do what you're told and you know it. However, I'm sure you can sit back and relax knowing that any ex-prisoners who would join the PSNI will have a less than amicable workplace to go to and would need the most brass of brass necks, and the thickest of thick skins to stay in the job.

Posted by: Baluba at September 2, 2005 01:04 PM


People with any kind of convictions should not be allowed in the police. Republican and loyalists can't have it both ways, they canot claim that they have no convidence in the police and then ask that people with convictions be allowed to serve (thereby unermining everyone else's convidence in the police).

Given the sensitive nature of policing in Northern Ireland, I would make all those applying sign a declaration that they are not members of any political party, paramilitary group, the Order Order, Opus Dei etc.

Posted by: Keith M at September 2, 2005 01:12 PM


How can Orde insist that it's time for Sinn Fein to join policing if he doesn't allow men with previous convictions to join? Has noone told him tht the majority of Sinn Fein's leadership has done time?

Posted by: glensman at September 2, 2005 01:40 PM


Keith,

A number of police forces around the world allow people with convictions to join them and if my memory serves me that includes the Met in london

Posted by: Kelvin Doherty at September 2, 2005 01:45 PM


who cares

they'll both be gone when it happens

Posted by: middle-class taig at September 2, 2005 01:56 PM


This is being presented as more than it is.

Orde and Rea said that no one with serious convictions would be allowed to join but there is many a member of paramilitary groups who has never been charged nor convicted.

Posted by: fair_deal at September 2, 2005 02:16 PM


What do you think of the fact that republicans will be joining the police soon, assuming they haven't already?

Posted by: Gonzo at September 2, 2005 02:46 PM


I feel that if the British Government are finally prepared to make the necessary legislative moves on policing, then republicans are in for a challenge, I think republicans are up for that challenge.

The question is are unionists? I feel that for some unionists, republican involvement in policing, is akin to Jim Molyneau's comments about the IRA ceasefire ie. the most destablising move since partition. It is clear that for many unionists change equals bad and they have set their faces against change, but unfortunately for them change is inevitable, better that they be part of it than drowned when the tide comes in.

Posted by: JD at September 2, 2005 03:10 PM


Is the Molyneaux quote the mandatory republican quote of this month?

I know this is man not ball but Jim Molyneaux had the strategic vision and political analysis skills of a lucozade bottle.

Posted by: fair_deal at September 2, 2005 03:39 PM


Why the hell would an ex-con want to join the police anyway? Just another pointless smoke-screen if you ask me.

Posted by: levee at September 2, 2005 03:47 PM


I see Levee has missed the whole 'we're not criminals' history in Irish struggle.

Funny, I thought it was a fairly significant part.

Republicans will be in the new force when it arrives. Don't see that happening for a while, but happen it will.
In South Africa, perpetrators of crime on the populace were allowed to remain serving alongside their new black colleagues and under their new black bosses. Neither side liked it at the time, but it was necessary, it happened, and now they are trying to work together.

Posted by: Baluba at September 2, 2005 04:19 PM


The problem now is the evolving criminality of the PIRA. SF have no real committment to a stable NI, or Rep of Ireland for that matter. Police officers who owe their primary allegiance to their political/criminal bosses will destroy any confidence in the police force and create a totally dysfunctional state, which would suit SF down to the ground. If people have any doubts as to where ex-prisoners will owe their allegiance, they should refer themselves to Martin McGuiness's statement after his evidence to the Saville Inquiry in Derry - basically that he had taken an oath as a PIRA volunteer which still over ruled any other considerations. This was the reason he gave for his tardy, begrudging and incomplete evidence to the inquiry.

Posted by: pacart at September 3, 2005 06:37 PM


Pacart,

McGuinness was a model of co-operation, honesty and fortrightness in comparison with the British authorities, the Ministry of Defence and the murderers, sorry, British soldiers who shot dead unarmed civilians. He didn't for instance hide guns that were used to murder, sorry, shoot dead unarmed civilians on that day in the far corners of the world.

If convictions by a flawed justice system, reliant on Diplock non jury courts, supergrass evidence and dicey forensic work are to be the arbiter of whether someone or not can join the PSNI (when it's fully reformed and a fit police force), then the future isn't too hopeful. After all the reason that more PSNI/RUC/B Special/RIR/UDR members were not convicted of collusion with loyalist paramilitaries is that they were the ones charged with catching themselves. There may have been a few honest cops in the forces of the British state but, unfortunately, the reverse of a rotten apples spoiling the barrel isn't true.

Hugh Orde is not above spin and deceit as his performance on last Wednesday night's BBC Newsnight signifies. He was asked by Kirsty Wark why weren't the PSNI doing anything to stop loyalist drug dealers etc from being active in Belfast.
Orde responded by claiming that a major drug dealing operation, with drugs worth £30m plus, had been taken off the streets that very day.
What he didn't tell the great British viewing public is that the drugs in question had been taken off the streets months previously and they had been, in fact, bound for Liverpool NOT Belfast. Not to mention that what happened that day is the drug runner had been sentenced to25 years, having been convicted sometime previously. Kirsty Wark hadn't the wit to call him to account for his new Labour style spin but perhaps she might be forewarned the next time.

The reason I mention this is that I have a feeling that Orde's bluster is very much for the unionist optics at the present. As well as not putting unionist paramilitaries, out of the intimidation and petrol bombing business, he wants to send the unionist community a message that they won't be policed by 'provos'.
That was always unlikely given the segregated nature of NI society. I don't see how he can avoid ex provos, those convicted of membership and probably even those convicted of other political offences, being in the PSNI and policing areas where they have traditionally held sway.

Posted by: Olbhéar Chromailll at September 4, 2005 11:12 AM


At present SF(Rafia) rule their enclaves by intimidation. Allowing ex-prisoners, read, SF placemen, into the police the UK govt. would be rubberstamping that arrangement.

Posted by: pacart at September 4, 2005 08:49 PM


"McGuinness was a model of co-operation, honesty and fortrightness in comparison with the British authorities, the Ministry of Defence and the murderers, sorry, British soldiers who shot dead unarmed civilians"

Is this a late entry for the Booker prize?

Posted by: Sean Fear at September 4, 2005 10:07 PM


No, but Saville sure should get something for being so patronising. Never mind this Clarke QC fellow who should not have been paid for the lousy job he did.

Posted by: Betty Boo at September 5, 2005 09:58 AM



NOTE: When adding hyperlinks, please follow this format:
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.

Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland.

Produced by Mick Fealty
Designed by River Path

News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com
(change "-at-" to "@")

Commenting Policy


Topics
a long peace?
books
Britain
Conflict
Culture
Economy
Education
election 2003
Election 2005
Enviroment
environment
Europe
Gaeilge
Glossary
Government
Highlights
Human Rights
Humour
International
Manifesto
Media
Nationalism
Negotiations
Parties
Policing
Soapbox
Society
Sport
the south
unionism

Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...
Just a Mo...
Commenting Policy
A backgrounder on the McCartney affair
Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far

Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)
Living on an island or in a state? - (31)
a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42)
Payout time... - (4)
New Lansdowne revealed - (24)
Far right 'imagination'... - (13)
Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3)
The price of peacemaking... - (17)
belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23)
Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)


Archives
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
March 2004
October 2003
September 2003
May 2003



Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered: Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com All rights reserved.