![]() |
|
You are here Home | Conflict | Loyalist decommissioning must be upfront and open Next or Previous « The wrong
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 29, 2005 Loyalist decommissioning must be upfront and open Like many things in Northern Ireland the arrangements around the decommissioning were made entirely in secret, and not simply the act itself, but who was chosen and when. That secretiveness alone is what makes it suspect in eyes of Unionist observer, argues Lindy McDowell. She ends with a typically wry but sharp perception: Meanwhile, it is weird, is it not, to hear Gerry invoking British intelligence assessments as proof that the Provies have indeed come up with the goods. When Gerry cites the "securocrats" you know it has to be seismic. When I read something like this I can’t help feeling the urge to hand out a history of the troubles or the Index of Death. It is very one sided because from what I can see the suffering received and distributed was not. But maybe I’m the one “peering into a pair of binoculars with the caps still in place”. Posted by: Betty Boo at September 29, 2005 11:28 AM Pah, if they decommissioned how are they going to protect their drugs empire? Posted by: phone india at September 29, 2005 12:03 PM Isn't it a fact that the weapons held by the Loyalist paramilitaries are such rubbish (compared to the sophisticated armoury of the Provies) that they are too embarassed to produce them for decommissioning? Posted by: Lhiannan-shee at September 29, 2005 12:48 PM They seem to do the job allright. Posted by: Betty Boo at September 29, 2005 12:57 PM Lindy McDowell is rapidly replacing Alex Kane as my favourite Unionist comentator. I only but hte BT when she's writing in it. Excellent article - especially the point about wanting to keep Unionists uneasy and distrusting - Anthony McIntyre made the same point. Posted by: Ginfizz at September 29, 2005 01:43 PM Lhiannan-Shee, (1) You are misguided and ignorant to the fact that both the UDA and the UVF have major arms contacts in Scotland, Germany, Croatia and South Africa to name but a few off the top of my head; or, (2) Perhaps you are more sinister than that and a republican trying to play down the operational capabilities of the Loyalist organisations...the IRA never recognise the Loyalist organisations than anything other than tools of the "Unionist establishment" and the British government. This is because they don't want the outside world to be made aware that there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives to remain free from being coerced into accepting a so-called "United" Ireland. They portray themselves as Irish freedom fighters against oppression and the British presence in Ulster-they don't want the truth to be known that they were also fighting a "war" against other Northern Ireland citizens who despised them and everything they represented...
Posted by: Concerned Loyalist at September 29, 2005 01:53 PM Given that some Unionists will be satisfied with nothing less than the imprisonment or execution of Adams and McGuinness, can the % of Unionists who are reasonable stand up now, please? Perhaps the BT will run another poll shortly. Posted by: Jo at September 29, 2005 01:55 PM Concerned Loyalist there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives to remain free from being coerced into accepting a so-called "United" Ireland. And which one of them is selling whatever is it you've been smoking? Posted by: Henry94 at September 29, 2005 02:04 PM It is pretty much from the same stable as the DUP. Who or what are we going to blame now for the years of neglect to our community while stoking the fear and bigotry? Who are we going to frighten the community with now we can no longer tell them they are all going to be murdered in their beds? Well lads and lassies you can't one day soon you are going to have to put your hands up and say yes it is our fault because if you look over the wall you will see that "themuns" are now just as impoverishted as yourselves. No you are not the "chosen race" we fed you a lie for the last 70 odd years and you never thought to question it. Posted by: Overhere at September 29, 2005 02:04 PM Henry 94, Posted by: Concerned Loyalist at September 29, 2005 02:12 PM ´´there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives´´ From what I remember they were a lot more disposed to cruising around the streets looking for someone, anyone, as long as it was fairly sure they were a ´´Taig´´, and murdering them, rather than risking their own lives. I have no time for the Ra either before you start, but give the heroification of scumbags a rest, please. Posted by: foreign correspondent at September 29, 2005 02:13 PM CL "This is because they don't want the outside world to be made aware that there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives to remain free from being coerced into accepting a so-called "United" Ireland." "counter-terrorist" is that over the counter or under the counter?? Posted by: red kangaroo at September 29, 2005 02:24 PM Overhere Interesting observation I was watching Mississippi Burning the other night Gene Hackman was telling the story of how his father had poisoned his black neighhbours mule because "If you're not better than a nigger who are you better than son!". His father could accept being poor as long as black people were poorer. Kind of reminded about the situation here as well. Posted by: Belfastwhite at September 29, 2005 02:25 PM Red, Posted by: Betty Boo at September 29, 2005 02:29 PM Concerned Loyalist: there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives to remain free from being coerced into accepting a so-called "United" Ireland.
Pity them, for they are a dying breed -- Austropithicus amongst the Cro-magnan. They have no unity, no discipline and purpose. They fight now over drug turf and, if'n you put your mind to it, will realize there is no way for these thugs to bomb and brawl their way to forcing Britain to maintain the Union. You must admit, their options are running a trifle thin; if they attack the Catholic minority, they will build sympathy for that community and allow Adams & Co. to bask in the heavenly light of the moral high ground. They attack the police / British army and that will be all she wrote -- their assault on the police puts pay to the lie of calling them "Loyalist." So, for the foreseeable, they will take door number three -- grouse a bit and attack each other, like the degenerate thugs they are, occasionally sallying-forth to do Big Ian's bidding -- a riot here, an arson there, only to be cut off at the knees when Big Ian needs to look respectable again. Sad, really. Posted by: Dread Cthulhu at September 29, 2005 02:49 PM Belfastwhite It does make you think. Another example of how we are really all the same is the reaction you hear overhere in England. Only "themuns" over here are the immigrants and it is the same old litany "how come they are getting everything and we are get nothing" Posted by: overhere at September 29, 2005 02:50 PM Overhere "It does make you think. Another example of how we are really all the same is the reaction you hear overhere in England. Only "themuns" over here are the immigrants and it is the same old litany "how come they are getting everything and we are get nothing" "
Posted by: red kangaroo at September 29, 2005 03:06 PM I thought it was a rather cunning ploy on the part of de Chastelaine and co to not publish the inventory of the IRAs weapons until all Loyalist weapons are decommissioned--it means that if Paisley wants to know what was decommissioned badly enough--he will have to push for Loyalist decommissioning to begin asap--this is an area he has absolutely no previous experience in--and to push for some Loyalist decommissioning-(I wont hold my breath) would cost him many votes in the future. Posted by: martin at September 29, 2005 03:11 PM Lindy McDowell? She's not exactly Spinoza. Is this the best liberal unionism, the Belfast Telegraph's presumption of itself, can come up with? Not much hope there then. Posted by: an cearrbhach at September 29, 2005 03:16 PM Lhiannan-shee Many photos show them carrying SA-80's, a modern and fairly decent assault rifle. They also have Ak's, a weapon of choice for todays terrorist. Few weapons are actually rubbish, even WW1 & WW2 weapons are every bit as lethal as any more modern weapon if they are well maintained. Posted by: maca at September 29, 2005 03:22 PM Concerned loyalist: wrong on both counts. I heard the poor calibre of Loyalist arms stated as fact by none other than Michael Mates, former Tory minister here, on the BBC Radio Four Programme "The long View" Posted by: lhiannan-shee at September 29, 2005 03:24 PM Is it anywhere written down that a full inventory of all arms decommissioned will be published when they are all decommissioned? Posted by: Betty Boo at September 29, 2005 03:32 PM "I heard the poor calibre of Loyalist arms stated as fact by none other than Michael Mates" Methinks he was talking through his arse. "If they had any decent weapons surely they would have used them instead of throwing pipe bombs" Are you joking? AK's Posted by: maca at September 29, 2005 03:45 PM I don't see why Michael Mates should say that if it wasn't true! I reckon he forgot that there are some people here who listen to Radio Four and so said something we weren't supposed to hear. It's a recognised syndrome. Posted by: lhiannan-shee at September 29, 2005 04:00 PM Peter Hains demands of loyalists are meanless without the British coming clean on collusion. This is a case of give us our guns back. Maybe Gordon Kerr (FRU) should be appointed to the IICD so that can verify that the amount of arms being decommissioned by loyalists is accurate. Posted by: JD at September 29, 2005 04:08 PM
Posted by: George at September 29, 2005 04:22 PM lhiannan-shee: "I heard the poor calibre of Loyalist arms stated as fact by none other than Michael Mates, former Tory minister here, on the BBC Radio Four Programme "The long View" Couple simple points... the fact that some of the Loyalist arms are not the latest and greatest is something of a red herring. Firstly, it don't matter if you're shot with the latest and greatest or some ancient, rusted P.O.S. or some cobbled-together zip gun, you're still shot. Secondly, a well-maintained weapons is like a diamond -- its forever, or so close as makes no odds. Thirdly, designs for some weapons have not changed much over the years -- the Colt 1911a .45 and the AK-47 being two prime examples. Lastly, I personally suspect that Loyalist reluctance has more to do with the source of the arms, rather than the age -- because I suspect that a number of these weapons will turn out to have come from across the Irish Sea. As for the pipe-bombs, they would be a substitute for grenades, not small arms. Posted by: Dread Cthulhu at September 29, 2005 04:22 PM CL (1) You are misguided and ignorant to the fact that both the UDA and the UVF have major arms contacts in Scotland, Germany, Croatia and South Africa to name but a few off the top of my head;, I hope for your sake no-one from Special Branch is reading this thread. Next time the PSNI have to 'discover' some loyalist weapons (keeping up appearances and all that) you might be getting a knock on your door, such is your apparent knowledge of the global arms trade. Posted by: Dec at September 29, 2005 04:41 PM DC Browning HP 9mmm is of the same era as the colt I believe, and is still in use with the Irish Army and possibly also the British Army. The Colt was only replaced a short while ago (80-90's?) by the US Army. lhiannan-shee, you can believe Mates but did you look at the photos I inkied to? Posted by: maca at September 29, 2005 04:52 PM Maca: "Old weapons like the Lee Enfield (.101") while being a heavy brute of a weapon and very old is as accurate as a sniper rifle and packs a fair punch" Isn't that the Lee-Enflield .303"? ;) Seriously, tho... you make my point -- firearms are like family jewelry -- properly treated, they'll last for generations. Likewise, I really don't care what's being fired if I'm the poor fella downrange. Posted by: Dread Cthulhu at September 29, 2005 06:11 PM "This is because they don't want the outside world to be made aware that there are indigenous counter-terrorist organisations willing to give their lives to remain free from being coerced into accepting a so-called "United" Ireland." Yeah cl, The loyal sons of ulster really struck a mighty blow towards saving the union when they tried to murder a 2 year old protestant toddler in Ballymoney, last night. Drugs, extortion and prostitution has nothing to do with being loyal. Posted by: walter at September 29, 2005 06:30 PM Maca :Yes I looked at the photos. The same 5 guns in every picture? Posted by: lhiannan-shee at September 29, 2005 06:50 PM "Home attack treated as murder bid A pipe bomb attack on a family in Ballymoney is being treated as attempted murder, police have said. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/northern_ireland/4292528.stm
Posted by: Dread Cthulhu at September 29, 2005 06:52 PM Lianan-shee: "Maca :Yes I looked at the photos. The same 5 guns in every picture?" Well, Lianan, lemme let you in on a little secret here in the post-Industrial Revolution, mass production era. One weapon of a given design pretty much looks like every other example of that design, with some tolerances. They;re a little like cars -- you have the plain vanilla model, to which you may add a few options, but that's about it. Similarly, even if they were building their own Sten guns in someone's metal shop, would that make a difference to those who have been shot? Posted by: Dread Cthulhu at September 29, 2005 07:22 PM Given that military style thugs cling to the advantage of having unarmed or unprepared opponents, it's hardly sporting to use a gun at all. At least suicide bombers show some personal commitment to the work in hand. Posted by: aquifer at September 30, 2005 01:36 AM úrnua tuaisceartach reabhlóid Posted by: Thomas from Texas at September 30, 2005 03:07 AM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.