![]() |
|
You are here Home | Negotiations | Amnesty proposals questioned... Next or Previous « Silly season: terrorists complaining of other terrorists... | Main | Orde says no to Provo Police... »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 02, 2005 Amnesty proposals questioned... THE Government is to allow suspected IRA fugitives 'on the run' back into the UK. However, Alliance's David Ford isn't convinced that the IRA will afford people on the run from the IRA the same courtesy. David Ford spotted 'anomalies'. Oh no. I'm sure they're all poo-ing themselves. This is overdue and a welcome development for the republican community. Céad míle fáilte romhaibh ar ais, a dhaoine uaisle. Posted by: Baluba at September 2, 2005 12:46 PM Baluba Do you think people forced out of the country will be given a "céad míle fáilte" if they return home too? Posted by: Gonzo at September 2, 2005 01:22 PM Well done to David Ford for raising this issue. It is important. There are a number of issues that need clarified. The most important being the position of people intimidated from their homes by these organisations. There must be a requirement that organisations whose members or ex-members avail of this make an offer of restitution to those they have intimidated, no matter what their *crimes* may have been. There is also the matter of the status of the crime committed. That status should ensure that the crime remains on police books in future regardless of someone claiming to have carried it out. If there is to be no cross examination, the onus should be placed on full disclosure by the person admitting to the crime. If it is not, then there will be no chance of families finding out what happened to loved ones. There should be no admission of statements that refuse to name accomplices, or call on the organisational omerta as with McGuinness in the Bloody Sunday enquiry. I am concerned that four or five patsys admit to all the crimes committed over the course of the troubles, allowing others to walk away from their responsibilities. If, subsequently, it becomes clear that others not covered by a scheme were also involved, they should be charged, and the person who claimed the action be made to serve their sentence. Posted by: Alan at September 2, 2005 01:34 PM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.