Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture Slugger O'Toole Notes on Northern Ireland politics and culture

You are here
Home | Society | About that Titanic proposal..


Next or Previous
« Irish Women take abortion demand to Brussels | Main | Historic murder trial »




SOS - Save Our Slugger!

Help fund Slugger's new software:

Or mail it direct to Slugger!



About that Titanic proposal..
The £100million plan for development of a Titanic tourist project in Belfast's docklands area was heavily publicised in the media yesterday.. and the BBC report is online here. With a nice drawing too. But reading closely, there is no breakdown of the figures for private/public funding and, despite the reported unveiling of the plan by Belfast City Council and the Northern Ireland Tourist Board in the article, it currently only has the backing of Tourism sub-committee - the proposal, and an economic feasibility study, still has to clear the full council on 1 September. Be nice to see more details of the proposals.. somewhere. No mention of that Iceberg though...

Comments (43)

Christ! When are these cretins ever going to realise - the Titanic sank resulting in one of the greatest ever peace-time losses of life at sea. Titanic = disaster. You don't go to Bhopal in India and expect to find some sort of chemcial poisoning-related theme park. Last time I checked Chernobyl wasn't home to a radiation-themed fun park. Hiroshima and Nagasaki don't celebrate their being the centres of nuclear disaster.

The risible obsession with the Titanic (a) shows the putrid depths to which Belfast has sunk in terms of its aesthetic, cultural and social outlook, (b) the sheer desperation of the 'city of culture'-type plonkers who seek to promote and develop the city internationally and (c) the deluded twattery of the Unionist political leadership at city level who STILL think that the naked sectarianism of the shipyards was something worth celebrating (witness Michael McGimpsey and his utterly preposterous plan to have 'Samson and Goliath' listed as 'monuments').

Posted by: Bored at August 12, 2005 05:34 PM


Anything is better than "All aboard Belfast's terror tour "

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/544851.stm

Posted by: G2 at August 12, 2005 05:59 PM


Gosh, Bored, well done! I wish I'd posted your post.

Posted by: Denny Boy at August 12, 2005 06:17 PM


Was that talk at the end of March/beginning of APRIL (there's the clue) about a melting iceberg not a joke, as in April Fool?

If what is being talked about now materialises and is tasteful and has a sufficient reverence for its memorial aspect, I like the sound of it.

Posted by: GavBelfast at August 12, 2005 06:25 PM


I like that picture. A full size neon, glow in the dark sculpture of the titanic down by the waterfront! It's genuinely impressive.

Maybe it could even spark a Belfast renaissance, or indeed naissance as Belfast has always been prettty much crap.

The whole area round the shipyard is a unique opportunity for something wonderful to be done.

But judging by the crap selection of boring, ugly office blocks that constituted the Laganside development, and the ugly concrete and tarmac and fly-poster enviroment around the odyssey - there is obviously no-one with the talent or the imagination to do anything worthwhile.

If that titanic sculpture turns out to be just a big version of those boring metal skeleton sculptures that are already all over the place, then the person who came up with the idea and the artist who drew that picture should be shot at dawn.

Belfast has fuck all shout about, it needs a leg up - Do Something Worthwhile!

Posted by: Nordie at August 12, 2005 06:51 PM


There's a great new sculpture at the end of the Queen's bridge at Oxford Street

Looks brilliant and i bet it didn't cost 100 mill.

More work like 'The Doll on the Ball', as locals have named it.

Posted by: short at August 12, 2005 07:06 PM


Right idea, several years too late. Maybe a 'slow learner' themed park would be more fitting for N. Ireland.

Posted by: Elvis the dog at August 12, 2005 07:10 PM


The drawing and the idea are really nice. But I am unsure if anyone has thought about what a 15 story 950+ foot long scaffold will look like during the day. During the tourism season in Northern Ireland it does not get dark till well after ten, when tourists are either in the pub or in bed.
Having done some work for an almost ran idea I am delighted to see that the dock will be preserved and the pump house renovated, they are beautiful.
I am sure the sculpture will be made of the same space age self cleaning alloys used in the Dublin Spire which recently needed a 50,000euro buff.

Posted by: Conánn at August 12, 2005 07:56 PM


Why not get H&W to build a seaworthy full-sized replica complete with 1912 decor and run it as a luxury cruise liner out of Belfast? It'd attract millions of passengers.

Posted by: Elvis the dog at August 12, 2005 09:44 PM


Actually, EtD... that might cost less...

Posted by: peteb at August 12, 2005 10:00 PM


Why not get H&W to build a seaworthy full-sized replica complete with 1912 decor and run it as a luxury cruise liner out of Belfast? It'd attract millions of passengers.

And and and you could have it hit an iceberg but it would be like a ride so that the ship would sink and then it could float back up to the surface and carry on with its voyage so nobody would die and you'd be able to have the complete interactive Titanic experience in the round over and over again...

Yoda, aged 3 1/4

Posted by: Yoda at August 12, 2005 10:08 PM


...or you could invite all the local politicians to go on the maiden voyage..

Posted by: iluvni at August 12, 2005 10:45 PM


We could have a dramatisation of the shipyard in the old days

We will have to get stuntmen to re-inact the catholic workers being driven into the water by the loyal workers..

Even better, film the boys during the uwc strike in 1974.

What a culture !!!

Posted by: pitt park at August 12, 2005 11:53 PM


Yoda,

(no, not you, the 3.25 year old)

Go directly to Hollywood (the California one, not the misspelled Ulster one) via Orlando (the Florida one, not the Tilda Swinton movie) and accept your prize. Remember folks, Americans LOVE this Titanic crap.

NOTE: I do not include myself even though I am a Yank. I've always preferred the Lusitania.

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 02:49 AM


" the Titanic sank resulting in one of the greatest ever peace-time losses of life at sea."

It was themunns that made it. :o)

Posted by: The Binlid at August 13, 2005 03:09 AM


We should have had this kind of thing years ago.

It will draw from across the world because the Titanic is an iconic subject, as much about endurance as loss. Half of its allure is the opulence of its build - and it was built here in Belfast by protestant and catholic shipbuilders, furniture makers, linen weavers, seamstresses etc.

There is a sideboard in the Harbour office that is a sister-piece to one on the Titanic. We should build a museum around that, starting with the staircase, the ball room and then to the wheel house and the cabins, ending with the engine rooms. Make it an incremental project and build a replica attraction, rather than a light show which, I agree, would look like nothing in the summer months.

Posted by: Alan at August 13, 2005 10:00 AM


It was designed by a bloke from Comber, it was a flawed design, it sank, what a suprise.....

Posted by: Big Paul at August 13, 2005 11:34 AM


I am so glad bored set the tone on this thread right away. The proposal is an example of one of those meetings when marketers sit around and think up ways to drum up tourist money. They ask, what is NI most famous for?
1. Violence 2. High rates of cardiovascular disease from high fat food 3. Sectarian murals 4. Amatuer version of FIFA football 5. Liam Neeson 6. High suicide rates 7. Titanic was built here 8. Van Morrison.
After review, they decide on the titanic.

I have never understood this hollywood glamour and glitz with this incident. Do you remember the headlines in 1997 "Titanic Musical sets Sail on Broadway!" Thats right, a friggin broadway musical about this ship.

It was a horrific death in ice water for 1000s of people, and now we are doing musicals and laser light shows? Anything for a few notes from a tourist. A small, and appropriate memorial would suffice.

Amazing what a little time can do in the "entertainment" industry. Imagine the outcry if they proposed "Sep 11th - The Broadway Musical"? Just give it some time. Pathetic, sad world.

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 13, 2005 02:12 PM


The risible obsession with the Titanic (a) shows the putrid depths to which Belfast has sunk in terms of its aesthetic, cultural and social outlook, (b) the sheer desperation of the 'city of culture'-type plonkers who seek to promote and develop the city internationally and (c) the deluded twattery of the Unionist political leadership at city level who STILL think that the naked sectarianism of the shipyards was something worth celebrating

Abso..bloody..lutely!

I sometimes wonder at Scots obsession with tragi-history, but the titanic thing and Belfast just cracks me up....

Posted by: looking in at August 13, 2005 02:30 PM


Hallion,

I think you're getting the point about American tourists. "Titanic" was a big success on Broadway, winning the Tony award for best musical of 1997. A friend of mine played 2nd Officer Charles Lightoller in the original cast (he's now in "Spamalot").

The one thing we don't have on this side of the pond is "Jerry Springer: the Opera."

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 03:51 PM


Alan McD - I appreciate the American tourist attraction bit; I'm not sure from your answer that you appreciate my point about the so-called entertainment industry? Musicals, singing, dancing, T-shirts, hats, balloons, pens and stickers surrounding human disaster??

Will your amigo be starring in Kobe: The Earthquake Show, and Bopal: The Union Carbide Dance anytime soon?

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 13, 2005 05:24 PM


I appreciate your point that the entertainment industry is pathetic, and I am reinforcing it with real life examples from both sides of the Atlantic.

My amigo will be happy, I'm sure, to star in any vehicle that "puts bums in seats."

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 05:42 PM


[Let's keep that link away from this site - ed Mod]

Hallion -24-7 - these people are friends of yours????

Posted by: Boris at August 13, 2005 05:56 PM


RE:

[Let's keep that link away from this site - ed Mod]

I have tried to get Belfast Gonzo to remove it from the More news from the Bible Belt... thread with no success. Can you please remove it?

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 06:11 PM


Mod,

Thanks.

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 07:19 PM


I hate to have to say it, but there are a lot of naysayers here who are condemning this initiative. With the notable exception of Conann (nice site, by the way), no-one has come up with much by way of an alternative!

The Titanic represents a massive Belfast export from the days when our local industries were the envy of the world. For others, it's a symbol of how man can still be beaten by nature. Remember, "God himself could not sink this ship"?

You are all running down Belfast and Northern Ireland. The City is regenerating itself and that's a good thing - try and be a bit supportive!

All the outside world ever hear about is the bad side of Northern Ireland. I suggest you some of you get out and rediscover what's good about the place. Otherwise, stop complaining!

Posted by: levee at August 13, 2005 08:16 PM


levee - "some of what's good about the place".

Perhaps you'd be good enough to tell us what YOU consider to be so good about Belfast. I'm not being sarcastic here, I'm genuinely interested.

Posted by: Bored at August 13, 2005 09:07 PM


Boris - I am not sure who you are referring to with the "these people" question...given that the mod has been doing some removing and I have no idea what you were talking about, I suspect it is Och Aye spreading his manure again.

Levee - It is one thing to promote art, the folk museum, the Antrim Coast Road, the castles and all that good stuff...we are talking about the issue of promoting a maritime disaster as a tourist trap. Think about it for a minute and maybe you can see the point bored was making. It is OBSCENE and shows desperation.

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 13, 2005 09:35 PM


I can't think of many "tourist attractions" worldwide that actually attract tourists, short of Disneyworld scale operations. Can anyone? People have a vague interest in the Titanic, mainly due to Leonardo de Caprio,they are not obsessed with the damn thing the way people here are. The idea that they will come to Belfast in their droves to look at a "light sculpture" of the same, and what will inevitably be a small scale museum is no more than wishful thinking. What was it Keats said about the Giant's Causeway? Worth seeing, but not worth going to see. And that's one of the world's natural wonders.

Posted by: pacart at August 13, 2005 10:10 PM


Bored

I love walking around Queens University and Botanic area, especially in the autumn when crisp leaves are littering the streets. When I have time, my kids and I go to the Ulster Museum which is always a treat.

Shoping in Belfast is excellent (as it is in Lisburn and now Antrim with the opening of Junction One), and Belfast's architecture is fascinating if you bother to look any higher than the shop signage.

Further afield, there's the Glens of Antrim, many beautiful and tranquil sites there. I've been over in Sperrin country recently and found that breathtaking too. If you start to look, you'll find plenty to like about NI, maybe stop being Bored (ha ha)!

In response to Hallion - what about proposed memorials on the site of the Twin Towers? Should tourists avoid those? There are plenty of markers of disasters that serve as tourist attractions. As Alan McDonald has said, the yanks are interested in the Titanic. Dare I say mostly because of the human tragedy.

A tour of chemical and biological warfare in Iraq would be obscene. You're overreacting.

Posted by: levee at August 13, 2005 10:14 PM


By the way, Hallion, what was your opinion of the movie a few years back?

On one hand, it grossed megabucks (and inflicted Celine Dion on us), but it vividly brought home the human tragedy and depicted the highs and lows of human behaviour during a crisis.

I liked the movie, despite the soundtrack.

Posted by: levee at August 13, 2005 10:20 PM


A minor correction to pacart's post -

It was not Keats.. rather, according to Boswell's biography of him, Life of Johnson, it was Samuel Johnson who said - of the Giant's Causeway - "Worth seeing, yes; but not worth going to see."

Posted by: peteb at August 13, 2005 11:44 PM


Pete B,

Thanks so much. You have renewed my faith in Yeats, and in Johnson, for that matter.

Posted by: Alan McDonald at August 13, 2005 11:46 PM


Levee - I appreciate your comments, and certainly support memorials such as that planned in NYC and those in Japan (Hiroshima and Nagasaki). They are of course appropriate. I am offended when disasters, natural or otherwise, are turned into money making schemes to draw people. I am also turned off by musicals, singing and dancing over disaster and selling T-shirts, people wanting to have their picture taken in front of, or near, these tragic places etc. It has never made sense to me.
As for the latest of a dozen movies (Cameron), it was well directed and he desrved an academy award for his efforts. Maybe it did raise the level of awareness of the suffering of those that died.
Pacart may be right in terms of what transpires with this, we will wait and see...

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 13, 2005 11:51 PM


I assume Keats' reputation remains intact, Alan. ;)

Posted by: peteb at August 13, 2005 11:52 PM


Hallion - There's the thing - I'm a bit of a song and dance man, myself!

Posted by: levee at August 15, 2005 01:36 PM


I agree with Elvis but i wonder if there are any of the skilled artisans left who could build a replica ship? I can understand some people having qualms about us celebrating the building of a ship that sank, but isn't it really about the magnitude of the tragedy, the bravery and stoicism of the many who died and the end of an era of glamour and excess? Come on, tourists who come here do express surprise that there is pretty much nothing in Belfast to mark its links with the Titanic.

Posted by: groucho at August 15, 2005 03:14 PM


well I have gone to France to see the sitrs of teh Normandy landings and the WW1 battlefields, and when in Asia I went to see the killing fields in Cambodia. I didn't buy a 'welcome to Cambodia, beware of the mines' t-shirt, but they were doing a roaring trade in them. I have also been in NYC and the 9/11 site has loads of tourists

Basically it's about going to places where important global/ historic events took place. The sinking of the Titanic was one such, not just another 'maritime disaster'.

Hallion if you think people don't flock to historical sites (which often saw the deaths of many people) then you need to get out more (and I'm glad your not working for the NITB).

And for those who try to get every thread back to party politics.. grow up please..

Posted by: idunnomeself at August 15, 2005 05:36 PM


idunno, regarding your comment - "Hallion if you think people don't flock to historical sites (which often saw the deaths of many people) then you need to get out more"
Where was it that I said people don't flock to historical sites?
I am well aware that many people choose to go to these places for various reasons...some for prayer, reflection etc, and others so that they can get their picture taken there as a tourist and get the souveniers. I have never understood that - is it to say, hey, I'm alive and well, I made it to the spot where others perished?? idunnomeself, why do you think people want a picture infront of tragic places?

To deny that there is no commercial interest and taking advantage of a maritime disaster.

Just FYI, I have been all over the globe, Asia, North America, Central America, Europe. Visting a memorial spot and reflecting is one thing, commercialization is another. Did you not see my suggestion for a memorial? Have a wee look back at my comments.

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 15, 2005 06:37 PM


Idunno - One more thing...you say you are glad I'm not working for the NITB... so am I.

Using your logic of going to historical places where many people have died, why leave NI??...its a tourist dream.
You can start with little entrys behind terraced housing in West Belfast, go up and down the Shankill, Falls and work you way outwards to Eniskillen. There are lots of historical and tragic locations, places where families lives were torn apart. No t-shirts, stickers or dancing. Maybe you can get somebody to take your picture at one of these many locations.

Posted by: Hallion 24-7 at August 15, 2005 07:08 PM


I quite like the idea of this as a cultural attraction along with some museums in the existing buildings on the island, which would be nice to see, evidence and presentations of the ship building enterprise here also is of course anticipated. And, if ever possible, it should be a great endeavour if the people with the money managed to get the Titanic launcher vessel from France. In a way it's an arbitrary thing, and a very pleasant idea. This would be very attractive and interesting moreso I think than for example visiting the "HMS Belfast" in London, and to the commentator who claimed it is not a daytime venture, one would assume that the lights would be very bright and very visible in the daytime. Otherwise, yep that's pretty important! Although bright lights might need a fund to maintain their use, I don't know just how hard it is for such a project to be made to cost a hundred million pounds however.

It is kind of symbolic as the whole Titanic area here with historic exhibits idea is largely just funny anyway, then riotously funny as well, as well in an extra sense to me as serious and quite diverting and interesting, in this position in Northern Ireland and on the yet to be discovered Queen's Island of the capital. It's all over and for decades without repercussion now, and, though partly involved in tragedy, also it all is within a flavour of humourous decadence and within this, perhaps along with respect, elements of disparity, dubious taste, or just how it is in this specific presentation. Its nothing that can't be quelled by a few unpatronising history lessons steeped in wonder and fascination.

In wonder, also bizarreness and I see something of both the elements of aware renewing revisionism of the Enlightenment yet with entrenchment in Modernity in such an exhibit and series of exhibits, it suggests the lightening of the cultural atmosphere of an expected culturally developing city. This yet magically also manages to suggest it can reinvoke the best, deeper and desired elements of culture and heritage facility: interest, involvement, situatedness in time and place, inclusion within individuality, wonder, removedness and audience-based attention, and the prompting of the individual. And the suggestion is also to make this aspect of history charming and fun and unloaded, rather than morbid and a bad choice as could easily be done.

I hope so anyway, as anything down the other route of "bad history" a suggested description with manifold meanings, should be a failure. My positive reactive vision is something truly in keeping with a Modern and Victorian centre like Belfast. I have no doubt that the former result could be managed whilst treating the tragedy of a nearly a hundred years ago, or four generations, with some respect. I do really hope also along with the commentator above that it's the opposite of a Scots-ish "obesession with tragi-culture", certainly at that price! I couldn't take that idea here, it's foreign anyway, and just at a time when an unseen proposed "normal" level of culture funding is sorely required even to, if ever in sight, bring the arts life to a normal standard here.

One would expect if there are culturally aware and interested people in the city, over the coming years a lot of that remaining warehouse space near this newly visitable city section here (and elsewhere) would be used up with agreements with the arts bodies and also private enterprises. This is hoped for. Along with other central people and mind, body, spirit and soul orientated developments of old buildings and spaces also.

Posted by: G.M.C. at August 18, 2005 04:12 AM


G.M.C. - are you stoned?

Posted by: Bored at August 18, 2005 10:32 AM


Why? Does it read like it?

But, the notion of this all being sold as just a "Ghost Ship" (rather than a kind of fresh, modern day nostalgic, new-cum-retro, Modern, Victorian style technological exhibition) undercuts optimism. They wouldn't... (?)

Description found at:

http://www.culturenorthernireland.org/

(mid-September)

Posted by: G.M.C. at September 13, 2005 04:43 PM



NOTE: When adding hyperlinks, please follow this format:
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.

Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland.

Produced by Mick Fealty
Designed by River Path

News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com
(change "-at-" to "@")

Commenting Policy


Topics
a long peace?
books
Britain
Conflict
Culture
Economy
Education
election 2003
Election 2005
Enviroment
environment
Europe
Gaeilge
Glossary
Government
Highlights
Human Rights
Humour
International
Manifesto
Media
Nationalism
Negotiations
Parties
Policing
Soapbox
Society
Sport
the south
unionism

Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...
Just a Mo...
Commenting Policy
A backgrounder on the McCartney affair
Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far

Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)
Living on an island or in a state? - (31)
a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42)
Payout time... - (4)
New Lansdowne revealed - (24)
Far right 'imagination'... - (13)
Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3)
The price of peacemaking... - (17)
belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23)
Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)


Archives
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
July 2004
March 2004
October 2003
September 2003
May 2003



Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered: Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com All rights reserved.