![]() |
|
You are here Home | Election 2005 | Election 2005: the issues that never showed... Next or Previous « African Aid | Main | Slugger wins 'idiotic comment' of the week! »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
June 09, 2005 Election 2005: the issues that never showed... The Election Commission's post election seminar took place at Queens just under a fortnight ago. It brought together a number of players from NI's political and civil society to look at what might be learned from the experience of this year's double election. I was asked to present a highly personal view of the main issues and outcomes of the campaign, which was followed by a fascinating series of presentations from each of the five main parties' directors of elections. All good realistic stuff. Tim Lemon gave few hostages to fortune, but presaged his shortish speech with the honest remark that his party had been the only true and visible losers in the election. The internal review arising is thorough and ongoing. Sean Kearney of Sinn Fein noticeably kept well away from his party's performance and concentrated largely on the negative effects of recent electoral reform on voter turnout. In the breakout group on politics and the media jointly chaired by Ciaran O'Kelly and Liz Fawcett led a spirited discussion between politicians and several members of the media. Both complained that the other was not sufficiently interested in issues, with one radio producer suggesting they'd had to manufacture a series of pieces on issues in the absence of any substantial response from parties. Politicians responded complaining that when the do put issue based material out, it is consistently ignored. Even where PA, for instance, made efforts to garner issue material from each of the parties this resulted in poor take up from the wider media. One DUP representative hinted too that when policy material is presented to the media they often miss important difference in detail. A representative of another political party told the group he had had to resort to photo opps to get any interest from any of the media outlets. It may be that without any significant means by which the local parties can formulate policy and drive it through the government machine - there is no real pull in locally written policy documents. However with both sides claiming the other is not listening, it may be time for the local media and politicians to get together and attempt to fill the communication gap? It is questionable whether local parties and the media can be up to the avalanche of issues to be dealt with. EU legislation alone could bury anyone. I've seen obviously overburdened party policy officers fail to get to terms with the big issues at consultation events. Not having had local legislators for a long time, lobbying may not have developed enough to drive policy innovation and differentiation. The local parties have very meagre resources to employ specialists, and the recruitment of MLAs from local councillors may not have helped to raise sights either. A party list electoral system could help get policy heads into the assembly and out of the much more secure advocacy related jobs in the voluntary, business, and academic sectors. We are too fond, addicted even, to political back seat driving. i.e. Whinging. Posted by: aquifer at June 9, 2005 03:11 PM I was really fed up that there was not a single mention that I could detect on the national stadium. Aside from one response out of about half a dozen letters I sent. (For anyone interested the one man who did respond was Tom Ekin who was Lord Mayor at the time.) Posted by: beano; EverythingUlster.com at June 9, 2005 03:31 PM A number of the parties launched issue themed leaflets e.g. crime so I don't know where the media producer gets the 'There was no issue stuff' from. Posted by: fair_deal at June 9, 2005 03:45 PM To clarify, I quoted a instance when the media ran a series on issues that the parties as a whole failed to respond to. You can't run a programme on the content of a policy document. The report here is by no means comprehensive, but I think it's fair to say that the upshot was that: "both sides [were] claiming the other is not listening". Posted by: Mick at June 9, 2005 04:01 PM It is very difficult for a party to go on about local issues when the local governance issue has yet to be solved. Voter: What about water charges? Using loaded terms like that could be considered an effort to alienate the GAA and IRFU, who already have national stadiums of their own, from the project. Posted by: George at June 9, 2005 04:11 PM It is going to be the National Stadium is it not? Maybe not for GAA (if they ever use it) or Ulster Rugby, but certainly for the Northern Irelkand National football team. Posted by: Leviathan at June 9, 2005 05:49 PM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.