![]() |
|
You are here Home | Media | Latest from Daily Ireland... Next or Previous « All-Ireland electricity market one step nearer | Main | Loyalists beat woman with bats... »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
June 10, 2005 Latest from Daily Ireland... PRESS Gazette reported yesterday that a quarter of the Daily Ireland staff have now been, as was expected, made redundant - a real pity for the journalists who threw their hat in with the new paper and are facing an uncertain future. The Gazette also carries this little gem in the Andytown News Group /Irish News grudge match that I missed - well, I suppose imitation is the most sincere form of flattery... The ABC figures are due around the end of the month, so I guess we'll find out soon enough whether the NIO decision not to advertise with DI was justified or not. Daily Ireland is claiming a five-figure circulation, while outside speculation averages about 7,000 sales. Irish News Editor Noel Doran said: " "I'd like to thank Daily Ireland for the trust it has displayed in the outstanding election service provided by the Irish News. The bill is in the post..." Ouch. Posted by: peteb at June 10, 2005 08:40 PM The ABC figures were promises at the end of April, and again by the end of May. Now they're promised for this month. Oddly enough according to the ABC site, DI's membership has only recently been approved. btw, still no reply from them as yet on those libel actions. Posted by: Jimmy_Sands at June 10, 2005 08:47 PM Do you like the way I blatantly nicked that second story off you Jimmy? ;o) I actually closed the comments for this thread, but it obviously hasn't worked. Posted by: Gonzo at June 10, 2005 08:49 PM Ah.. that may have been my fault, Gonzo.. oops.. sorry.. Was there a reason for closing the comments? Posted by: peteb at June 10, 2005 08:50 PM Yes. Posted by: Gonzo at June 10, 2005 08:52 PM Yes. Posted by: Gonzo at June 10, 2005 08:52 PM This ridiculous republican vanity publishing project is about to hit the buffers and everyone, I mean EVERYONE, should be delighted by the ensuing distaster. Posted by: Fanny at June 11, 2005 01:55 AM Whatever my views I will draw the line at taking delight in the fact that people have lost their jobs. My impression, speaking obviously as someone unsympathetic to its political slant, is that it has made little effort to persuade; my reading of it brings me no closer too understanding why people would believe what they profess to believe. Instead I detect a defensive tone which assumes that its world view is already shared by its readership. As far as it goes of course that assumption may be correct, but it would appear that this constituency is too small to sustain its ambitions. Posted by: Jimmy Sands at June 11, 2005 02:28 AM Jimmy, I am humbled by your generosity of spirit. Because when DI goes under, everyone else I know is going to laugh like a drain. Posted by: Fanny at June 11, 2005 11:06 AM DAILY IRELAND GOING UNDER.............. Gosh... Gulp....Grief..... What will we all do................ BACK TO THE ANDREX THEN. Posted by: The Devil at June 11, 2005 08:49 PM Btw..... The D.I returns were giving an estimated average of sales around 4100. Posted by: The Devil at June 11, 2005 08:53 PM Let's hit the library next and burn all the books. Posted by: pol at June 11, 2005 10:52 PM Fanny Nobody has ever made a go of an overtly party/sectarian/tribal/whatever newspaper in NI The Irish News takes a blantantly SDLP party line and is extremly successfull. Posted by: PS at June 11, 2005 11:38 PM Well that's where you're wrong PS, because the Irish News predates the SDLP by a good 80 years. Everyone else in the world, meanwhile, can tell the difference between an independent newspaper with an editorial line (however aligned to one party) and a pure propoganda rag, set up and run specifically for the purpose. Posted by: Fanny at June 12, 2005 12:43 AM Wonderful stuff pol. I think I'm going to steal that line. Posted by: Jimmy Sands at June 12, 2005 03:00 AM Yes Pol, wouldn't this be the same Andersonstown News Group that [threatened to] sued Newshound a couple of years back for publishing listings from The Blanket? Just because the knew Newshound couldn't afford to stand up to them? Censorship, how are ye? Ironic really, when you realise that if it wasn't for Newshound's listings now nobody outside West Belfast would even have heard of their latest rag. Posted by: Fanny at June 12, 2005 01:32 PM Don't assume this will close. It would only be sharp business practice to launch a media outlet with more journalists to ensure the thing goes off with a bang, getting the freshest and most enthusiastic writing to hook readers, setting up formats that can be carried on with less well qualified and cheaper staff etc. It could boil down to a full colour propaganda sheet with local ads, but with free newspapers subsisting on the same diet, I'd be surprised to see it go soon, especially with the scale economies of the AN stable. Unless the RM get sick of their own voice. Its one thing shouting at other people, especially ones you don't like, but talking to yourself is not healthy. Posted by: aquifer at June 13, 2005 12:58 AM I'm not so sure. DI was launched on the assumption that subsidies could be bullied out of the Brits amid accusations of 'discrimination!' if they were not forthcoming. Amazingly, this proved a bridge too far even for Jonathan Powell to justify. The DI business model is operating minus one of its fundamental assumptions and he is a shrewd enough businessman to realise the situation is hopeless. Hence all the squealing of 'discrimination!' now to salvage some sort of political points from the ensuring disaster. Posted by: Fanny at June 13, 2005 01:09 AM DI does not get enough advertising as it is to sustain itself, hence its current troubles; losing a quarter of its staff is not going to help, regardless. It is not attracting enough local ads now to meet its labour costs (firing the news editor? With the track record of some of its more notorious staff, DI needs all the editors they can get to catch stuff before it goes to print!), how will it be able to have the manpower to canvass 32 counties for local ads to sustain itself in the smaller model Aquifer proposes? Impossible, and not a smart business plan. DI is not using smart business sense in a capitalist sense nor in a fair labour sense. It isn't making the revenue to sustain itself. Working staff on the cheap may get them by in West Belfast, but not in the long term in the national market. Either the strategies must change or the paper will die on the vine, or perhaps scale itself back to a Belfast daily. However, that will be tough going, as its main competition in that market will be its own stable. In that arena their local weeklies already duplicate the same material (something that their locals have always done), and it is and will be DI that suffers in sales. Even with an overlap of local ads if they persuade enough traders to go for daily ads in addition to the weekly ones. Local traders may not have the budget to include that kind of advertising however and will be forced to choose between what is good for their own business and what will pull DI/ATNG out of a spot. A tough choice if DI is fooling around with its sales figures to save face. Is the ATNG contemplating consolidation of all its local titles into one daily, covering the whole city everyday in one paper? That is one solution to ensure DI survives, at the expense of their other product. DI is a vanity project in some respects and its future depends on how much vanity is invested in it. Posted by: xyz at June 13, 2005 10:10 AM Fanny - as a resident of Andersonstown I resent your vitriolic attack on the good people who reside there. I strongly recommend that you put up or shut up regarding an area you clearly know nothing about. What propaganda are you referring to? Posted by: Snapper at June 13, 2005 11:00 AM I would be very surprised to see this paper close at all - despite sluggish sales I don't expect ATNG to give up on it too easy and reckon that it will stick about for the forseeable future.I would expect its readership to grow slowly but steadily if it can see out the current problems. Posted by: Blackadder at June 13, 2005 11:38 AM What attack on the people of Andersontown, Snapper old boy? I have made no such attack nor referred to the people of Andersonstown at all. Why did your fevered imagination conjur up such a reference? You shouldn't mistake criticism of Daily Ireland for criticism of the people of Andersonstown - I certainly wouldn't, for clearly the people of Andersonstown aren't buying Daily Ireland... XYZ, I heard it said by another before DI launched that there just weren't enough Curley's ads in the world to support a daily newspaper and that rather simplistic assessment now appears more sophisticated than all the pre-launch market research put together. Posted by: Fanny at June 13, 2005 12:48 PM How predictable of you to do anything but answer my question. As I said put up or shut up - what evidence have you got on a demographic basis that the people in Andersonstown do not read the DI? Or what evidence do you have that the paper spurns out propaganda? Im afraid my dear that you are very much mistaken and I suggest you direct your sectarian bile somewhere else. Once again catholics daren't raise their head and speak up for themselves. God forbid a community rallies together and produces a paper which challenges the status quo. Why are you so fascinated in this quality paper? Does it threaten you in any way? I have never heard such ranting and raving in all my life. It would appear that they are doing something right if they have you in such a tizzy dear! Maybe you should take a wee lie down and rest your weary head. Posted by: Snapper at June 13, 2005 01:16 PM Fanny, please stick to your argument! We getting more heat than light at the moment. Posted by: Mick at June 13, 2005 01:47 PM For the record fanny - the people who produce the paper by and large live in West Belfast and very accurately represent the views articulated by that community. At least have the b***s to stand by what you said - stop dressing it up to avoid looking sectarian. To avoid anymore manplaying I will not contribute anymore to this post - I have made my point. Posted by: Snapper at June 13, 2005 01:47 PM Snapper "what evidence do you have that the paper spurns out propaganda?" The evidence - every edition so far? "what evidence have you got on a demographic basis that the people in Andersonstown do not read the DI" DI aims to be at least top half of Ireland paper with aspirations to be All-Ireland. With sales claims of 4100 to 10000 (on this thread) that would indicate that either every edition is being bought exclusively in Andersonstown or it is not selling well in Andersonstown. Overall some are being overly-sensitive about the problems of DI - the Daily View just failed despite it trying to project a non-sectarian image - it doesn't make liberals on here think their views are not commonly held? So why should it be any different for republicans? Unionist glee at the problems is also overly excessive. Yes, the supposed midas touch of republicanism takes another bashing especially post-Christmas 2004 and possibly that Project Unity 2016 isn't grabbing the nationalist public imagination. However, Unionism cannot afford to be complacent republicanism will want to come back. Posted by: fair_deal at June 13, 2005 01:50 PM Catholic population of Northern Ireland - 800,000 There - now I've made my point as well. At no point have I criticised the people of Andersonstown or 'Catholic people' at all and it is pure poo-stirring to deflect the argument in this direction. I'm the only man being 'played' here. Posted by: Fanny at June 13, 2005 01:50 PM Snapper - to be fair I can't see anything in Fanny's remarks which could be read as a slur on the people of A'town. Posted by: DCB at June 13, 2005 01:52 PM If I'm to say anything about the people of Andersonstown, it'll be this: while they may have to put up with provo editorialising in their local paper in order to find out what's on in the leisure centre and see who's celebrating their 19th birthday this week, they clearly aren't prepared to suck it up every day in the form of a wannabe 'national' paper. Nor are they apparently too impressed by the mentality of a movement whose every pronouncement screams "We are the community" regardless of whether the community is buying their line or not. My wife is from Andytown by the way. Although admittedly she does do my head in. Posted by: Fanny at June 13, 2005 02:01 PM [Play the ball, pol - ed. Mod] Posted by: pol at June 13, 2005 08:12 PM it doesn't make liberals on here think their views are not commonly held? They're not, though... :))) Posted by: IJP at June 13, 2005 11:45 PM Death of an historic Irish Catholic Church. One of the first major Irish Catholics Church's in America. St. Bridget lasted through famines, wwworkers laws, drugs, prostitution, mental illness, homeless people all over the streets, cultural changes and so on. The church could survive all the deadly sins except one: greet. Once the community was gentrified and property became so valuable, it seemed necessary to sell. One large hunk of money, put into a bank, or maybe a defense fund for all the sex with children, either way, not a good reason to close a needed church. PS if you can help please contact me. This afternoon the diocese removed artifacts from St Brigid church. Posted by: clayton at July 26, 2005 05:42 AM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.