![]() |
|
You are here Home | Election 2005 | Does the internet matter in politics? Next or Previous « Family accuse Loyalists of brutal assault. | Main | Didn't vote? Tell us why? »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
May 11, 2005 Does the internet matter in politics? I was just discussing this subject with a colleague, when Jane at Slugger Central sent me a link to this piece on the BBC website: Was this an internet election? For journalists, the answer is "no". For web junkies, it's "of course". And for electors? Well, that may be the most interesting question. Party membership, for example, is plummeting, and party loyalty a much more fluid affair than it was a generation ago. Nowhere was this trend starker than in the plethora of tactical voting sites. Rather than putting a cross in the same box as last time, voters have been using the net to make a choice based on other factors: the likelihood of it making a difference, the past record of the candidates (regardless of their manifesto pledges), or to prioritise specific issues, especially Iraq. It is tempting to characterise this kind of voting as the consumerisation of politics, but that trend is better reflected in the limited but depressing phenomenon of votes for sale, illegally, on the auction website eBay. By contrast, online strategic voting and vote swapping is far more passionate and dedicated, as with the massively popular voting advice websites we have been looking at, like Who Should You Vote For? and The Public Whip. Slugger, what are your views? Posted by: Kevin at May 11, 2005 08:55 PM Some people in North America have taken up vote swapping via people they meet on the internet. You agree to vote for their preferred party in your constituency if they thus have a chance of winning and your preferred party has no chance. They, in turn, agree to vote for your party in their constituency. Requires a degree of trust. Posted by: Joe at May 11, 2005 09:06 PM And it says a lot about the state of democracies that people need to go to such lengths to get what they want from it. Posted by: Kevin at May 11, 2005 09:21 PM Yes it is important, if used correctly, as it makes it easier to communicate with people, organise campaigns and control image. It will not win you a seat on its own but is a useful tool. That said most political websites are for the political anoraks. Posted by: A.W. at May 11, 2005 10:12 PM no Posted by: aston at May 11, 2005 11:09 PM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.