![]() |
|
You are here Home | Britain | BBC's objectivity criticised Next or Previous « Steven King's "completely unscientific starting prices" | Main | Poetry: Northern Ireland's undervalued export »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
May 16, 2005 BBC's objectivity criticised In today's Guardian an ex BBC reporter (Robin Aitken) accuses the Beeb of 'institutionalised leftism'' and also thinks that the UUP got a rough ride at their hands. He doen't make any specific reference to BBC NI... the link isn't working Posted by: fair_deal at May 16, 2005 03:19 PM This is the right link. http://media.guardian.co.uk/site/story/0,14173,1485066,00.html Posted by: John at May 16, 2005 03:25 PM Thanks john. I mustlook for reviews of the book might be worth buying Posted by: fair_deal at May 16, 2005 03:36 PM Hello...it's me Dessertspoon....sorry to interrupt the political discourse but I just wanted to invite you to take part in the Slugger referendum on the Good Friday/Belfast Agreement. Just click here to vote. The question is "Do you feel the Good Friday Agreement is still relevant and should be implemented in its entirety?" as suggested by JL Pagano. Posted by: Dessertspoon at May 16, 2005 04:03 PM I voted twice, hope that's OK. Posted by: barney at May 16, 2005 04:17 PM OMG - Electoral fraud!!! Posted by: Dessertspoon at May 16, 2005 04:30 PM From a republican too. Shock! ;-) Posted by: fair_deal at May 16, 2005 04:31 PM Is it still fraud if they cancel each other out? Posted by: barney at May 16, 2005 04:50 PM The answer is probably yes but it could be a mitigating circumstance. Also your indecision on the agreement makes you sound perfect for the UUP, why not throw your hat in the ring for leader by the looks of Steven King's list it is all comers welcome. Posted by: fair_deal at May 16, 2005 04:54 PM Nothing new in this, the BBC like most journalist / media organisations are left wing and anti - unionist. This is not that much of a problem for unionists since the recent election results show beyond doubt that these "sages" are of little importance as the DUP ahead of all rivals in spite of thinly veiled contempt from BBC NI in particular. Their importance is deliberately talked, usually by themselves, I guess they are fully paid up members of the self preservation society. Posted by: Darrell Monteith at May 16, 2005 05:18 PM Anti-unionist? Carruthers, Thompson and especially Davenport always seem very anti-SF more than anything else. Posted by: Paul O at May 16, 2005 05:27 PM It is as well Robin Aiken didn't include BBCNI in his analysis as it is the compltete opposite. Right wing pro-union. Posted by: Snapper at May 16, 2005 05:31 PM Impartiality is impossible. The main thing is that the BBC annoys DUPes and Shinners in roughly equal measure, because (a) they deserve it and (b) the media is Northern Ireland's 'opposition' by default. Posted by: Fanny at May 16, 2005 05:32 PM I agree with paul o on the Devenport point Fanny, Im not a SF supporter but I can still see an obvious bias. If you have read the biography of Adams that he co-wrote, you'll see plenty of examples that ruined an otherwise good read. Posted by: Gum at May 16, 2005 09:47 PM For non-Brits, who don't know about the vicious thuggery used to fund the BBC, a post here. Posted by: W.C. Varones at May 16, 2005 09:48 PM And if you read the autobiography Adams wrote himself... Posted by: Fanny at May 16, 2005 10:15 PM I think the BBC is a great organization, but not without it's faults. Good journalists tend to be people who question authority, and the BBC are more independent than most which is probably why unionists in particular have a problem with them. Republicans equally despise the BBC as a pillar of the establishment, forgetting that a lot of the collusion revelations they like to go on about a lot came from BBC investigations, such as Panorama documentaries. Posted by: Comrade Stalin at May 16, 2005 11:10 PM "Republicans equally despise the BBC" Not really, more so UTV Posted by: Chris Gaskin at May 16, 2005 11:14 PM The BBC clearly have some good journalists Sadly this does not extend to some of those within the written media The Sunday World carried a story yesterday regarding the murder of Lisa Dorrian It claimed that jewellery found on a beach close to the scene belonged to lisa, this has been denied by the family,who were at no time contacted by the journalists or paper with regard to the story. The Sunday World claimed that a major breakthrough in the case had been made. Will some journalists and newspapers sink so low as to make up a story ,just to get a front page headline and sell a few extra copies The obvious distress of the family over the story is heart breaking Another example of our local gutter press Posted by: marc at May 16, 2005 11:30 PM For many years, while living in the bush in Africa, my only source of news was from the BBC World Service.
Posted by: 6countyprod at May 16, 2005 11:45 PM Ah yes but BBC World Service is staffed entirely by nice little rich girls from Oxbridge with a huge guiilt complex about daddy's millions in general and how daddy's millions landed them their jobs in particular. Posted by: Fanny at May 17, 2005 12:53 AM Thanks for voting.
Posted by: Dessertspoon at May 17, 2005 09:11 AM Yes, Noel Thompson, the one and only, the wannabe intellectual, wannabe Jeremy Paxton. And when it fails (usually, since there has to be something there in the first place to take something out) he resorts to offending and feels all mighty if successful. Posted by: Betty Boo at May 17, 2005 09:34 AM Wannabe Jeremy Paxton? Who is he? Presumably you mean the author of the critically acclaimed "Manchester United Football Annual 2001?" He's the only Paxton I can see on the interweb! http://www.isbn.pl/A-jeremy-paxton-extensively/ Posted by: Conor at May 17, 2005 09:47 AM Conor, Newsnight. Very smirk and arrogant but brilliant. That would be the one. Posted by: Betty Boo at May 17, 2005 10:10 AM "I was regularly appalled at the BBC bias against White South Africans...every day, either on the regular news bulletins or special reports, there was an anti-Apartheid." Sorry that you were appalled, but thats what you get for being on the wrong side of the biggest moral issue of the last half century.... Posted by: Jo at May 19, 2005 11:20 AM |
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.