![]() |
|
You are here Home | Conflict | But what does it mean? Next or Previous « IRA statement in full! | Main | Blogging of a killing... »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
March 08, 2005 But what does it mean? Right, the disclaimer. There's nothing in this statement that suggests what level of punishment the IRA had in mind for these guys. Two, they have noted the fervent wish of the family to see justice done properly through the courts. The IRA is staying its hand. The message is subtle, but potentially important. The problem is that it may be too subtle for the wider audience that's currently attempting to understand the shocking import of the initial headlines. Broom of Anger blog picks up the mixed message straightaway. I do wonder what "physical action" those soft liberals in the IRA would have been willing to countenance?
Posted by: slug9987 Being serious, I do not think this plays well with an external audience. I am not qualified to say what NI nationalists will make of it. Maybe in the Short Strand they will like it. What about the median nationalist voter. Again, I cannot say. But it looks GOD AWFUL to me to be offering "physical action". Brutality by IRA members followed by IRA brutality on the brutal IRA members. It' all negative. And it looks reactionary - are we supposed to believe that the IRA would have made this offer of "physical action" against its own brutal members if the McCartney sisters campaign had not had so much resonance in the nationalist community? This is about votes - says I.
Posted by: slug9987 I think it is clear what it means, the IRA has done all it can, short of shooting those involved? How else do people expect the IRA to compel those involved to come forward and incriminate themselves and others? Please tell me what actions should they take? Should they take legal advice from Alberto Gonzales, or the IMC? Please suggestions on a postcard.
Posted by: PaddyCanuck They should expel all IRA *witnesses* who do not give evidence.
Posted by: slug9987 The Broom makes some very valid points.. as usual. and I see, UTV news, that Sinn Féin (or at least Gerry Kelly) has resumed interpreting IRA statements again.. well that didn't last long.. did it?
Posted by: peteb It means the IRA has had its head buried in the sand for the past few months.
Posted by: Belfast Gonzo And these guys were considered political geniuses? They have made themsleves a laughing stock. This is like watching a bad episode of The Supranos, with Tony acting like he was police chief of "Joysee", only its Gerry Kelly thinking he is Chief Constable of NI. As Broom says, if this weren't so serious it would be funny. But she is right, this is a battle for who is Police Chief of Belfast. I hope the McCartney girls succeed in showing what real republicanism looks like: the rule of law, not of men.
Posted by: Pat Flannery Once again , nothing in the IRA statement about the Law, or Courts, or Police.
Posted by: spirit-level Has the Republican Movement now got the same advisers as the Orange Order had for all those Drumcrees? Whatever next?
Posted by: GavBelfast Go here to see opinions of BBC online readers.
Posted by: slug9987 Gerry Kelly's interview on Channel 4 News on this subject a few moments ago was simply shocking - Sinn Fein/PIRA just don't get it - they have provided the evidence in thier own statement that by threatening to carry out a shooting, which is a criminal act, they have breached the ceasefire. They're all on licence. Lets bring them in!
Posted by: drumcree Complicated. If it had been a member of my family ? I would have told them to do it. And probably have regretted it later. The problem with the offer was that it was forced out of them and looks as if it is expedience rather than a measured response by a disciplined organisation. IF they had gone ahead and done it a couple of days after the death who would be saying what ? Most people would, I suspect, feel little sympathy for the murderers and would object on principle or more likely in an opportunistic response.
Posted by: Davros Post a comment
|
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.