![]() |
|
You are here Home | Glossary | Glossary: what is Whataboutery? Next or Previous « Slugger Glossary... | Main | McGuinness: Irish naive on resuscitation of process? »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
February 09, 2005 Glossary: what is Whataboutery? Familiar to anyone who's followed public debate on Northern Ireland. Some define it as the often multiple blaming and finger pointing that goes on between communities in conflict. Political differences are marked by powerful emotional (often tribal) reactions as opposed to creative conflict over policy and issues. It's beginning to be known well beyond the bounds of Northern Ireland. Some years back the BBC quoted Cardinal Cahal Daly as having described Whataboutery as "the commonest form of moral evasion in Ireland today", referring to how both communities use the terrible burden of past events to lay obstacles in the way of peace. Evasion may not be the intention but it is the obvious effect. It occurs when individuals are confronted with a difficult or uncomfortable question. The respondent retrenches his/her position and rejigs the question, being careful to pick open a sore point on the part of questioner's 'tribe'. He/she then fires the original query back at the inquirer. Historical subjects can be the worst. Rational perspective disappears and opponents are forced to assume moral responsibility for their community's past sins. The substance of the issue is foregone for an emotional power play that comprises the solipsistic concerns of the participants, with little regard for fact or quality of argument. http://www.langerland.com suggest people should visit this site
Posted by: armaghman What is 'whataboutery'? Just see any of the more lengthy threads on this site, for a case study. I was always told it was a sign of ignorance to answer a question with a question. Doesn't seem to bother too many folk on here though.
Posted by: ricardo Thing is, nothing happens in a vacuum, so whataboutery is usually justified, if boring.
Posted by: slug9987 Whataboutry, as practiced in these environs, is making a historical metaphor bear the weight of an argument which is absurd when stated in it's own terms. Slugger threads get long enough to give your Pentium a hernia when these tortured metaphors are broken on the racks of tenuous argument. It is also boring as hell.
Posted by: James Is whataboutery not necessary to expose hypocrisy ?
Posted by: Davros I see no harm, and possibly much good, in each side of an argument reminding the other of past transgressions. A good discussion should, however, contain much more, or it becomes tedious.
Posted by: johnhidd "Is whataboutery not necessary to expose hypocrisy ?" I'll buy the hypocrite a drink, wash his car, send his kid to college and praise his wife's petrified pork roast to the high heavens if only you guys would GET TO THE POINT of the argument. Whataboutrty is why the North "bores people rigid". There should be a Betty Ford center for it. Note the North American spelling of whataboutry.
Posted by: James I would give you a suitable example but you would accuse me of whataboutery ;)
Posted by: Davros Is whataboutery not necessary to expose hypocrisy ? Yes hypocrites use it often.
Posted by: ShayPaul You sound ever so bitter there shay - been caught a few times, huh ? :)
Posted by: Davros cheers
Posted by: ShayPaul Lately I think a lot of commentators have been suffering from a severe bout of whataboutery, and its great that Mick has raised the issue because its becoming to be daily occurance if not an hourly one. Its all very predictable. All it takes is for a unionist sluggerite to point to some atrocity from the provisional IRA and invite the nationalist sluggerite to condemn it. Rather than condemn the nationalist throws about some atrocity committed by unionist death squads or the British Army. This then leads the unionist to locate some other unfortunate killing to throw into the escalating written poker game of whatabout this and whatabout that. If theres one thing I've learned from these whataboutery Sluggerites, its that for every atrocity there always has to be an equal and opposite co-atrocity.
Posted by: Nathan Post a comment
|
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.