![]() |
|
You are here Home | Government | NIO to clamp down on bad parking... Next or Previous « One for the US readers... | Main | The big freeze is coming... »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
November 03, 2004 NIO to clamp down on bad parking... MESSAGE to John Spellar MP: We can live with water charges, you can get rid of the 11-Plus, you can close all the railways - but for God's sake do NOT privatise traffic wardens! Clamping is not something the car happy people of Norn Iron will take lying down, as they have in other parts of the UK, and this is obviously part of the great conspiracy by Labour to annoy/rip us off/irritate us back into devolution again, I can just tell... Although traffic wardens are attached to the police here, they were never really a target throughout the 'Troubles'. Why start now(although they would be privately run, and so could more easily attract cross-community hatred)?! Or is this merely another cunning cost-cutting measure to compensate for the lack of resources provided to the PSNI? So I guess my message to John Spellar is: "As drivers, we all detest traffic wardens, but we hate clampers more. We will fight them in the parking bays. We will fight them on the single yellow lines. We will even fight them when we are parked less than 15 feet from a street corner and possibly obscuring the view of right-turning traffic. "And if all else fails, I suppose we will grudgingly pay the damn £90 to get home on that inevitable rainy night when we first get clamped by some over-zealous jobsworth on a power trip." This is going to be as big as revenue-raising speed cameras. Traffic wardens to be privatised, Murphy meets Shoukri; Mc Donald and Mc Farland. Is this just a terrible coincidence.
Posted by: Pat Mc Larnon Pat - It's all a bad dream. Kerry will step out of the shower as President of the USA.
Posted by: Davros Two things. If you dont illegally park you wont get clamped. Secondly speed cameras have reduced the death toll where they have been placed. There is no call to speed. Keep within the law and it wont affect you. God Save The Queen.
Posted by: ulsterman This is a little off topic, but I was wondering what everyone thinks of those who put traffic cones at the side of the road thinking that they are allowed to reserve a parking space for themselves?
Posted by: Occasional Commenter Agree about the cones. Those people in the Markets were also a disgrace intimidating people from parking on public roads.
Posted by: willowfield Pat Funny, I was thinking that myself.
Posted by: Belfast Gonzo One reason Dundalk introduced clamping was because our northern brethren had a habit of parking illegally and not paying their subsequent ticket fines. It worked in this instance. As for cones, a disgrace. Get a driveway.
Posted by: George Residents Parking Schemes ? They can work well providing the Councils don't regard them as a cash crop.
Posted by: Davros Does that mean the "Agreement" will be clamped cos it seems to me that it has been parked for an awful long time :-)
Posted by: The Devil While the problem of cones can be annoying I would ask people to understand the predicament of people who live in areas like the Markets. Personally the car drivers should realise that they do have some civic responsibility.
Posted by: Pat Mc Larnon What do you think of a Residents parking scheme then Pat ?
Posted by: Davros Pat While the problem of cones can be annoying I would ask people to understand the predicament of people who live in areas like the Markets. If the Markets residents want to stop people parking on the street, then they should lobby to get double or single yellow lines put down. Otherwise it is a public road and open to anyone to park. They're also lucky they have gardens: I don't have a garden. And I cars park outside my house all day long. I don't put threatening notes on their windscreen, though. And, in any case, the cars aren't parked outside their homes. They're parked on that street beside Central Station: there are no houses fronting on to that street.
Posted by: willowfield Davros, Willowfield, "If the Markets residents want to stop people parking on the street, then they should lobby to get double or single yellow lines put down. Otherwise it is a public road and open to anyone to park." Single and double yellow lones would apply to the residents as well. It is a public road and open to anyone. That is what is causing the problems. "They're also lucky they have gardens: I don't have a garden. And I cars park outside my house all day long. I don't put threatening notes on their windscreen, though." Some have gardens that are very small and most could not accommodate a car. Good to see you are not threatening people. "And, in any case, the cars aren't parked outside their homes. They're parked on that street beside Central Station: there are no houses fronting on to that street." Afraid not, they are parked throughout the Markets area. If anything it is that part of the area on the other side of Cromac St around Sussex Place etc that has cars parked outside homes. Why can't people just use car parks?
Posted by: Pat Mc Larnon I'm with Davros on this one (my driveway comment was a bit flippant). My road was full every morning of cars parked by people who then walked into the city centre to work. Up came the parking restrictions of €1.80 and hour and, hey presto, now it's totally clear and my permit costs a mere five euro a year. One car allowed per house.
Posted by: George five euro a year ???? Edinburgh Central area – Zones 1 to 4 * £160 for 12 months
* £80 for 12 months One per house has been controversial.
Posted by: Davros Those prices are scary Davros! More worrying for me is that they're going to start weighing my bin from the new year when they collect my rubbish and charge me accordingly. I get 42% tax relief on it but still a worrying development. I always thought I'd be dragged kicking and screaming to the bottle bank but it looks like financial necessity will mean I'll meekly shuffle there once a week.
Posted by: George Tax relief as you run a business from home ? We were charged extra by the council in London when I ran a business !
Posted by: Davros Nope Davros,
Posted by: George That seems like a strange and inefficient system George.
Posted by: Davros In what way Davros?
Posted by: George It's a horribly indirect way for Central govt (tax rebates) to partially fund Local government. Why doesn't the Govt give dosh direct ?
Posted by: Davros Because it will be much harder for them to take it away again I assume and maybe local government can't be trusted with doing the right thing with the dosh.
Posted by: George ah! so there's a carrot as well as the stick :)
Posted by: Davros I'm pretty much with Pat on this one (miracles will never cease). However, this announcement is more likely to PREVENT residents' parking schemes here in the near future than lead to them. I know someone has been trying to persuade the authorities to introduce a pilot scheme, and the excuse for not doing so is the cost of policing the scheme, what with the PSNI being strapped for money etc. If there is an impending switch to private clampers, why would the PSNI fork out for a pilot if the whole kaboodle is going to be privatised in the future? It will be delayed at least until the Government sets up the GoCo (Govt-owned company) to look after parking matters. ...sadly. Quite how one car per house will work in Belfast, with its countless HMOs (Houses of Multiple Occupancy) is anyone's guess though. And if I had a gate and someone parked across it every day, well, it would be unfortunate were some hooligan to let the air out of the tyres wouldn't it...? You'd still be trapped, but at least it would be a laugh.
Posted by: Belfast Gonzo I oppose privatisation, but if it leads to more clamping and more fines for illegal parkers, I'm all for it.
Posted by: willowfield Gonzo- it doesn't have to be one per house. Loads of HMOs in Edinburgh. All one has to do is prove residency. We could , for example, use the electoral register.
Posted by: Davros No reason why there should be anything other than a nominal cost for residents' parking schemes.
Posted by: willowfield There's a fair bit of expense involved initially WF.
Posted by: Davros True, but once that's done it's a relatively cheap administrative exercise.
Posted by: willowfield Post a comment
|
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.