![]() |
|
You are here Home | Media | Losing the truth in the news... Next or Previous « Ireland's top for free press... | Main | Mr Orde »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
October 30, 2004 Losing the truth in the news... Regardless of the degree of press freedom, Alex Kane believes the press we do have is all too often happy to propagandise rather than simply tell us the truth. The result is that people are increasingly reading what they want to hear, and journalists are beginning to be trusted less than jobbing politicians. By Alex Kane Sixty-six years ago, on October 30th, 1938, at about 8.30 in the evening, a couple of million Americans filled their cars with food and headed for the hills. Many others made their way to local churches for impromptu services, and still more sandbagged their homes and unlocked the weapons cupboard. And the cause of this widespread panic? They believed that their country had been invaded by Martians! At a time when three quarters of the population listened to radio as their main form of entertainment and information, they tuned in to hear what they believed was a "live" news broadcast. Snug in their front rooms on that cold autumn evening, with whole families gathered around their "household friend," they listened in mounting terror as an obviously terrified reporter told them; "Good heavens, something’s wriggling out of the shadow like a gray snake. They look like tentacles to me…That face, I can hardly force myself to keep looking at it, it’s so awful." What they were listening to was Orson Welles’ dramatisation of War of the Worlds. But they didn’t know it was a dramatisation. Almost half the audience had tuned into the programme after they had switched stations when a popular comedy show had ended. They hadn’t heard the announcer introduce a drama. They believed it was a genuine news story, for why would anyone use the radio to fool and scare them? The moral of the story, of course, is never to act before you have all of the facts. But the lesson drawn from the incident by politicians, media observers and advertisers in America, was the demonstration of how powerful a propaganda and promotion tool radio (and later, television) could be. Today, six and a half decades later, the media still like to fool and scare us, and millions of people are still prepared to be influenced by a diet of distortion and half truth. Whatever happened to the Aids epidemic that was to sweep across Europe, leaving millions of dead in its wake? Whatever happened to the global warming that was to leave the United Kingdom a rain-parched land? Whatever happened to the BSE scare that would see "meat off the menu for decades"? My hero, Sherlock Holmes, had the right approach: "It is a capital mistake to theorize before you have all the evidence. It biases the judgement." He would surely have approved of Rebecca West’s view that journalism is "…an ability to meet the challenge of filling space." Today, it is hard to avoid the conclusion that too many journalists fill too much space with too little hard fact. (And yes, I can hear your chorus of pot, kettle and black!) Which may explain why a recent Mori survey of public trust in the professions indicated that the groups least trusted to tell the truth are, in descending order, government ministers (23%), politicians in general (22%) and, you guessed it, journalists (20%). Hardly surprising, when a considerable amount of journalism has become locked in a downward cycle of propagandising, distortion and trivialisation, which can be just as bad, and frequently worse, as the government spin that is routinely condemned by the press. A free and independent press should be the cornerstone of a democratic society; a fearless champion of truth and exposer of corruption and hypocrisy. Today, we read and hear what we want to read and hear. We want our personal bias reinforced by programmes and papers owned by chasers of profit rather than pursuers of truth. If Martians did land this evening, I suspect that most of us would simply wonder who had paid them to come and hazard a guess as to how long it would be before they made the cover of Hello! First published in the Newsletter on Saturday 30th October 2004 Good column. Enjoyable as always.
Posted by: AndrewD It is clear that many are up to the challenge of filling space, but what with? Tribal platitudes, sanitised for a public forum, will always pass the editorial standard in divided NI. And why probe too deep, get to the chunky bits hidden at the bottom, or prick the gassy bubbles, when the oily surface has so much journalist colour. And what a debt the press owes the paramilitaries and political provocateurs. All those monster demonstrations, the pyrotechnics, all that blood. Only fair to provide newsprint for their political fingerpainting. Luckily the internet has creating vast new spaces where the mediocre is devalued currency, and where the public record should be in a searchable database. Journalistic research and analysis takes time. Time, talent, and courage cost money or should, and there is only so much that advertising can pay for. Journalistic deadlines make it hard to bring the analytical focus to bear. Even gold standard news organisations have trouble presenting current stories that contain specialist or scientific issues that have known resolutions. If we won't pay for the analysis maybe we need more speculation, a degree of respect befitting a society that shoots people and maims children, and plenty provocation. A scattergun should hit both stale and sorry sides about equally.
Posted by: aquifer Post a comment
|
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.