![]() |
|
You are here Home | Human Rights | Charter debate: more questions than answers Next or Previous « Busy Glenn? | Main | Blair pace-maker »
SOS - Save Our Slugger!
Help fund Slugger's new software: Or mail it direct to Slugger! |
September 30, 2004 Charter debate: more questions than answers The e-debate has been slow to start, but there's been some interesting questions that have arisen out of the first few days of discussion. Here's a short outline of some of the main points so far. Colin Harvey will have more questions tomorrow. The discussion so far has raised more questions than answers. The primary one being whether we really need an all island charter when, in theory at least, the European Convention on Human Rights already covers both parts of the island? There’s also the question of whether an all-Ireland charter pre-supposes a future unification of the island? Although the debate has not as yet probed this as thoroughly as it might. There’s the two speeds of progress in legislation in the two states. Despite the controversy experienced in Northern Ireland in formulating a widely acceptable bill of rights, the UK has already translated much of the convention into law already with the Human Rights Act of 1998. The Republic has yet to consider fully what extensions, if any, it will legislate for in Irish law. Is it possible that an informal charter can bridge the gap? The provision of ‘minimum standards’ under the convention was taken to mean different things to different people. One contributor felt that children’s rights and those of the disabled might provide fertile ground for an extension of the convention. Clearly it allows for a sliding scale of legislation to be tempered by local/national consensus. Mick You ask "Is it possible that an informal charter can bridge the gap? [between a Bill of Rights in NI and the European convention as incorporated into Irish Law]". In my view that's precisely what the Charter should do. I have already posted a comment on the reasons why I believe the programmatic charter would be the wrong choice. But it's also the idea that the charter itself should seek to 'enhance' any particular 'group’ rights that I question. The charter, or even the Joint Committee, was not empowered to do this - the Agreement describes it as relating to "fundamental [human] rights". This surely means the rights of the individual to be able to live their life without disadvantage or prejudice – rights that should not be categorized by ascribing them, or worse ascribing different rights, to different groups. The charter should set out those individual human rights as fundamental and the law should be enforced to ensure that those rights are not infringed. The programmatic model appears to approach the issue the other way around and attempt to gradually build up to, and possibly go beyond, those fundamental rights of the individual. It is politics' role to produce future policies of governments – those policies can and should be tested against the fundamental rights once those rights are endorsed by the respective legislatures, and that is where the Joint Committee should concentrate its future efforts.
Posted by: peteb Why do we need (a) additional rights to those already in the European Convention, and (b) these additional rights to be on an all-Ireland basis?
Posted by: willowfield Just thought that this conversation was happening in the absence of any recognition that Sinn Fein has been consulting widely in the community/voluntary sectors and with ngos on its draft Rights for All Charter.
1. The people of Ireland have the right to national self-determination.
1. Nothing shall justify the domination of one section of the people by another or the domination of one person by another (e.g. harassment and bullying).
1. Everyone has the right to life.
1. Every child has the right to be protected from all forms of physical, emotional or mental violence, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, injury or abuse (including sectarian and racial abuse), neglect, bullying, maltreatment or exploitation, including sexual exploitation or abuse.
1. Every person living with a disability has the right to have their whole person recognised, their capabilities valued and developed to full potential, and their dignity respected.
1. There will be no systematic or institutional discrimination against any section of the people of Ireland or those living on the island of Ireland.
1. The state shall provide the necessary resources to address the legacy of the conflict in Ireland.
1. Ireland shall be an independent sovereign state which respects the rights of sovereignty of all nations in keeping with (and subject to the constraints of) international law.
Posted by: Donaloc Sinn Féin and human rights? You're having a laugh, right?
Posted by: willowfield Willow, play the ball - it's more interesting.
Posted by: Mick Fealty Donaloc is right to raise the SF document ... it's worth reading. They struggle at times.
Posted by: Davros Equal rights for all; Equal rights for all to be targeted by the Provos?
Is that democracy with or without private armies?
Does that include the right not to suffer punishment beatings?
Including those disabled as a result of shootings, bombings, beatings, etc.?
Including the right not to be put out of work by terrorist destruction of the economy?
Does that include Provo kangaroo justice?
Posted by: willowfield What's the feeling about implementation in the Republic?
Posted by: Mick Fealty Stormont venue for major discussion on All Ireland 'Rights for All' Charter
Sinn Fein Human Rights and Equality Spokesperson, South Down MLA Caitríona Ruane has said that the meeting of over 50 activists from the ethnic minority community, gay and lesbian community, disability community and community and voluntary sectors in Stormont today to discuss Sinn Fein consultation document, the All Ireland 'Rights for All' Charter is evidence that there is widespread support for increasing the debate about creating a society where human rights are enshrined. Speaking ahead of the meeting Ms Ruane said: "Six years after the Good Friday Agreement was signed and overwhelming endorsed by the people of this island we have not seen the progress it promised. Instead of full implementation of the Agreement in all its aspects, we have seen delay, foot dragging and inaction where the British government has direct responsibility. This is rooted in the British government's tactical approach to the Agreement. "This demands action to challenge systematic and institutionalised discrimination against any section of people living on the island of Ireland. Governments have a duty to ensure that all people have equality of opportunity and equality of access and a duty to take proactive steps and affirmative actions to ensure social and economic equality. "Both governments, but particularly the British government, have failed to deliver equality and eradicate discrimination in the 6 counties. They have failed to deliver for those marginalized and excluded. A charter of rights must guarantee, promote and protects the 'Rights for All'. Sinn Féin is also aware that we have a responsibility to build an inclusive society, which addresses the political allegiances of unionists and guarantees their rights and entitlements so that they can have a sense of security and a stake within an Ireland of Equals." ENDS
Posted by: Davros Wow ! Éire Nua is one HELL of a document ! I’m surprised the Yanks didn’t bomb SF HQ. Sinn Féin proposals from 1979 DRAFT CHARTER OF RIGHTS We suggest a charter of rights on the following lines: "We, the people of Ireland, resolved to establish political sovereignty, social progress, and human justice in this island do hereby pledge that we will practise tolerance and live in peace with one another in order to achieve a better life for all and we declare our adherence to the following principles: Article 1. All citizens are born free and equal in dignity and rights. Every person is entitled to the rights of citizenship without distinction of any kind, such as distinction of race, sex, religion, philosophical conviction, language or political outlook. In addition, it is intended that the European Convention on Human Rights should be made part of the internal domestic law of the New Ireland.
Posted by: Davros You keep posting all their documents here, Davros, and 'the Yanks' will start thinking of a different HQ to hit ;o)
Posted by: peteb Post a comment
|
Slugger O'Toole records news, commentary and diverse opinion on Northern Ireland. Produced by Mick Fealty News, tips or crits here: mick.fealty -at- gmail.com Topics a long peace?books Britain Conflict Culture Economy Education election 2003 Election 2005 Enviroment environment Europe Gaeilge Glossary Government Highlights Human Rights Humour International Manifesto Media Nationalism Negotiations Parties Policing Soapbox Society Sport the south unionism
Highlights
Out with the crystal ball...Just a Mo... Commenting Policy A backgrounder on the McCartney affair Northern Bank raid and political fallout, so far
Readers comments
More corrupt than last year? - (4)Living on an island or in a state? - (31) a combination of historical ignorance and monumental self-pity - (42) Payout time... - (4) New Lansdowne revealed - (24) Far right 'imagination'... - (13) Nazi comments were a sectarian slur - (3) The price of peacemaking... - (17) belfast metropolitan area plan unveiled - (23) Why (or rather how) Alec Reid was right... - (37)
Archives
October 2005September 2005 August 2005 July 2005 June 2005 May 2005 April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 July 2004 March 2004 October 2003 September 2003 May 2003 |
|
Design: River Path Associates Comments: Big Blog Co Powered:
Movable Type 3.15 Copyright © 2003 Sluggerotoole.com
All rights reserved.
|
<a href="(URL)">hyperlink</a>
It is important that you include http:// when adding the URL.